![]()
The First ChurchThe Convocation at PentecostPentecost is the Greek name for the Hebrew Shabu'ot or Festival of Weeks.
"Pentecost occurred on the fiftieth day after Passover. This festival originally marked the early harvest of the ancient Canaanites, but the Jews had taken that over and superimposed on it a celebration of God's gift of the Torah and its reception by Moses on Mt. Sinai. So Pentecost marked a major moment in Israel's history and was celebrated with a vigil service covering twenty-four hours." In modern Israel, the wheat usually ripens in May and the harvest lasts approximately five weeks. All Jews celebrated the Pentecost and the multitudes that gathered in Jerusalem from the outlying regions posed a regular security problem for the Romans. The following convocation resulted in a revolt in 4 B.C.E.
"The covenant renewal ceremony was, in fact, performed at the festival of Shabu'ot (Pentecost), which commemorates the Sinai revelation [which] fell according to the Qumran calendar either on or one day after the eleventh sabbath of the year." The main goal of the members of one of the sects, the Therapeutae, was to have a vision of God. During a festival like Pentecost they would put on white robes and gather together to share a communal meal. Parallels can also be found in Jesus' transfiguration on Mount Hermon.
The Gathering of the Apostles
"After Jesus' death his followers soon experienced spirit-possession and other 'pentecostal' experiences, all of which, again, would be categorized as dissociative in nature. Thus we have a pathologically dissociative clientele (conversion disorders/ demon possession) who were cured by their faith in a spirit-possessed healer and, probably, their tendencies toward dissociation were re-oriented by Jesus toward experience of the Kingdom. After his death his personal talent for induction of the Kingdom experience was no longer available. The dissociation prone group of followers then continued to experience dissociation but in what was for them a new form, spirit-possession, glossolalia, etc. This they defined as the sine qua non of Christian life (cf. Paul, Acts, John) and they deliberately went out to bring about that experience in other people by the use of techniques that may be knowable from the evidence we have in the NT." A major convocation of the Apostles and Jews from throughout the Roman empire reportedly occurred seven weeks after the crucifixion of Jesus, during the celebration of Pentecost
"The 'upper room' (hyperoon), where the first community was remaining (Acts 1:13: hou esan katamenontes) after the ascension and where the Pentecost event occurred (Acts 2:1-2), already had an established significance for Luke. Luke seems to represent this center as the prototype for the primitive churches places of worship. The Greek word (hyperoon) in the New Testament appears only in Acts and always in contexts that denote a place of worship. According to Acts (9:37, 39) Tabitha, a member of the community of widows in Joppa, was laid in such an upper room after she died. Acts 20:7-8 describes an early Christian meeting for Sunday worship in an upper room at Troas in Asia Minor. This report, given in the first person, specifically observes that 'there were many lights' in the room (Acts 20:8). Moreover, inside the 'house of Peter' in Capernaum, which was transformed into a house church by the second half of the first century, numerous fragments of oil lamps have been found. Upper rooms had previously acquired some religious significance in the Old Testament (2Kgs 4:10-11: aliyya; Dan 6:11: 'alit, LXX: hyperoon). This is perhaps why, at a later time, they became favorite meeting places for scholars. As shown by a third-century synagogue inscription in Stobi (Dalmatia), even synagogues sometimes had special upper rooms (hyperoa)."
Contact with the Spirits
As revealed in shamanistic Merkavah visions, the tongues of fire were angels. In Isaiah's symbolical vision such fiery spiritual beings are called seraphs (the only such identification in the Bible.)
The number of the seraphim "is considerable, as they appear around the heavenly throne in a double choir and the volume of their chorus is such that the sound shakes the foundations of the palace. They are distinct from the cherubim who carry or veil God, and show the presence of His glory in the earthly sanctuary, whilst the seraphim stand before God as ministering servants in the heavenly court. Their name too, seraphim, distinguishes them from the cherubim, although it is confessedly difficult to obtain from the single Scriptural passage wherein these beings are mentioned a clear conception of its precise meaning. The name is oftentimes derived from the Hebrew verb saraph ('to consume with fire')....The seraphim are mentioned at least twice in the Book of Enoch (lxi, 10; lxxi, 7), together with and distinctly from the cherubim."
Speaking in Tongues
As described in the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice the worshippers, in a communal ritual, would hypnotically intone the language of the angels, singing praises to God.
"The leaders of the exaltation possess tongues of knowledge [so as] to bless the God of knowledge for all His glorious works."
See "The Tongues of Men and of Angels" for more about the angelic liturgy.
"The whirlwind and the chariots of fire that marked the Elijah story became the mighty rushing wind and the tongues of fire in the Pentecost story." Opening the Door to the Gentiles
In the story of the Tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1-9), "the divisions in the human family created by human brokenness destroyed the human attempt to build a tower into heaven where humanity and divinity could be united. The symbol of that division was the confusion of languages. Now Luke was saying that in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, the human family was invited anew into God."
According to Acts, Peter was the first Apostle to baptize gentiles:
"Acts 11:19 states that the apostles and disciples of Jesus had still been 'speaking the word to none except Jews'. Jewish customs, however, are not changed by mere heavenly signs. The question regarding the admission of Gentiles was brought before a court of elders in Jerusalem. While it was recognized generally that 'a door of faith had been opened for the Gentiles (Acts 14:27), some of the Christian Jews (who, by the way, continued to identify as Pharisees) did not believe that Gentiles should be exempt from circumcision and observing the whole Law of Moses."
The Movement of the "Meek" and "Poor"
"We often read that Jesus 'shook the foundations' of Judaism. It is clear, however, that Judaism was not very severely shaken, although Jesus was probably an irritating presence, as were his followers after his death. There was, however, at the time of his execution, no rounding up of the disciples, nor was it necessary to suppress crowds of rioters. It is likely that, during his lifetime, Jesus made a smaller impact for God do not worry much about numbers or about realistic strategy."
"Sanders is of course correct that there is no evidence of Roman intervention or requests for Roman intervention; nor is there evidence that the chief priests sought from Rome authority to act against the movement in Jerusalem or Judea. But that ought to raise serious doubts about the messianic orientation of the community in Jerusalem, i.e., the public proclamation of Jesus as a divinely appointed ruler nullifying the actions of Roman and Jewish authorities against him and demonstrating their illegitimacy. It should also make one far less inclined to suppose that the Gospel Passion narratives constitute sources from which one can extract and reconstruct the historical circumstances and reasons for the death of Jesus."
"The socioeconomic status designated by änî ["poor"] involved not simply lack of money or possessions, but first of all powerlessness and vulnerability vis-a-vis the powerful (and often arrogant) members of society....There is an implication of 'being unjustly deprived of one's rights and goods' in änî; accordingly, the regular adversaries of the 'poor' in the OT are not the rich but the wicked, the arrogant, and the oppressors. This status often evoked - at least according to many religious affirmations in the OT - an attitude of humility toward and reliance upon God, before whom one had to stand empty-handed, without pretensions but with hope."
"The Righteous Teacher suffered physical and emotional torture from the 'Wicked Priest', who had exiled him from the Temple priesthood. True to his religious heritage and brilliant theological sensitivities, the Righteous Teacher, who had led his followers to the monastery [camp] in the desert before he had finished composing some hymns, looks back on his tortures with thanksgiving praises to God, who had redeemed his servant, 'the life of the Poor One'."
(2) The Ebionites
"The movement that seems subsequently to have developed also came to be called the Ebionites (i.e. 'the Poor Ones'), a term of self-designation running the gamut of the Qumran documents."
"The word translated as 'poor' -drigu - is the origin of the Persian 'Darvish' or 'Dervish' - a name still used for certain (whirling) sects of Muslim Sufi mystics - and it had a specific and special sense, meaning a pure, devout, and humble person, a true follower of Zoroastrian doctrine: a believer. It is also identical in meaning to the Hebrew ebionim, translated as 'Ebionite' - the term used by the Essenes [Yahad] of Qumran to describe themselves - and both terms are reflected in 'Cathar'-derived from the Greek for 'pure'-as well as in the Templar title, 'The Poor Knights of Christ and the Temple of Solomon'."
"...Christian communities were at first formed in the name of Jesus as a founder-teacher. The teacher-sage was invested with the authority of Wisdom's envoy to enhance the significance of the teaching as various Jesus movements confronted challenges and sought a place in the social landscape of Galilee and southern Syria. Along these lines, a continuing wisdom trajectory can be traced into second century Christian gnosticism. On this view, the resurrection of Jesus is not the common center of all expressions of early Christianity. Moreover, the communities whose foundation myth was the kerygma of Jesus' saving death and resurrection do not represent the dominant basis of association from the beginning and arose in circumstances different from those of the Jesus movements. These are the pre-Pauline and Pauline congregations of the Christ located at first in northern Syria and Asia Minor."
"It is clear from the Pauline corpus that in some sense the community following the leadership of
"...The first ten bishops of the Jerusalem Church were, according to the 'Church Father' Eusebius, all circumcised Jews who kept Jewish dietary laws, used Jewish liturgy for their daily prayers and recognized only the Jewish Sabbaths and festivals, including the day of atonement. This last observance clearly demonstrates that they did not regard the death of Jesus as atoning for their sins!"
"By this statement he means that the Ebionites do not regard Jesus as divine. He does so, using the 'Wicked Demon', 'Devil' and 'net' language that is so much a cornerstone of the presentation of the charges in the Damascus Documentagainst them. Knowing that Ebionite means 'Poor Man in Hebrew', he jokingly contends that they received this epithet because of 'the poverty of intellect they exhibited', i.e. in following such a primitive Christology.
(3) James the Just
James title, the Just or "Righteous One" (Zaddik) was borne by claimants to the High Priesthood, a lineage that dated back to the time of King David.
In the Gospel of the Hebrews, "the account of the resurrection is unique in that James is the first believer to see the risen Jesus (see 1 Cor 15:7), not Peter or Mary of Magdala, as in the other gospels."
In the gospels, the order in which the Apostles saw the risen Jesus usually indicated the apostolic succession - which depended on which community the gospel originated from. (Peter, of course, was the first Apostle according to the synoptics and Paul.) James, the brother of Jesus, is mentioned in the gospels of Mark and Luke, but not Matthew and John. James is an English rendition of the Hebrew Jacob by which he would have been known by his Jewish contemporaries.
"Tyndale was...a good Oxford-Cambridge trained Greek scholar and based his translation on the 3rd (1522) edition of Erasmus' Greek text (which later was to be called the textus receptus). He consistently rendered the Greek IAKOBOS as 'James.' Thus, in the first chapter of 'The epistle off Paul unto the Gallathyans' he has Paul say: 'Then after thre yeare I returned to Jerusalem and abode with hym xv dayes / non other off the Apostles sawe I / save James the lordes brother.' The first used of James in place of Jacob may have occurred in John Wycliff's English translation of the Bible ca. 1375 CE
- Tom Simms (CrossTalk)
The title "Righteous One" was apparently mistranslated into Greek as "Sadduc" or "Zadok" and was a term particularly associated with the Davidic Messiah. Sadduc was also the name given by Josephus to the co-founder of the Zealots.
"As Eisenman [Maccabees, Zadokites, Christians and Qumran] demonstrates, the legitimacy of the high priesthood - of Zadok or of the Zadok - was resuscitated by the Maccabeans, the last dynasty of Judaic kings, who ruled Israel from the second century BC until Herodian times and the Roman occupation."
"...James title, 'Bishop of Jerusalem', and the description of him in almost all early Church sources as 'high priest', reverberates with the materials before us here..."
Quoting Hegasippus, Eusebius states that James 'the Righteous' 'was holy from his birth'..." Hegasippus also desribed him as a "Nazirite".
Spreading the GospelAfter the death of Jesus, the apostles lead by Peter began to actively seek converts. The opposition was immediate:
"The high priest reprimands the apostles for their determination to hold the authorities responsible for the execution of Jesus and to spread the teaching throughout Jerusalem.
"For the implied reader, of course, this shows how much the authorities fear the Jerusalem populace. Following Gamaliel's intervention, the apostles are flogged, charged to cease, and released only to return to proclaiming Jesus as the Messiah daily in the temple and at home (5:27-42)."
"It is interesting to note that the only time in Acts that the authorities make reference to the execution of Jesus is in response to accusations concerning their own guilt....In Acts, the resurrection of Jesus occasions controversy only because of school debate between Sadducees and Pharisees, not because proclaiming it as the vindication and exaltation of Jesus is an act of defiance against the authority of those who put him to death. The crucifixion of Jesus by the Roman and Jewish authority in Judea has, in the perspective of Acts, theological and historical consequences for the Jews, but no social and political consequences for the apostles."
"In connection with the persecution under Herod Agrippa 1, Luke introduces (Acts 12:12-14) another meeting place in Jerusalem [besides the location of the convocation at Pentecost]. The account not only describes the outside (Acts 12:13: a house with its own gateway) but also gives the name of the owner - Mary, the mother of John called Mark (Acts 12:12). Other Christians under the leadership of the 'Lord's brother,' James, gathered at a different location (Acts 12:17)."
"It has sometimes been held that persecution was directed against the preaching of faith in Jesus, a condemned criminal, as Messiah...There must be, however, appreciable doubt about this as a ground of persecution. If it were, it should follow that Christianity was persecuted and hounded wherever there were enough Jews to give the followers of Christ a hard time. Yet, to repeat, it is clear from Paul's letters that the leading Jerusalem apostles were not persecuted, at least during his career, even though they believed that Jesus was the Messiah."
"John the Baptist was executed and a movement associated with his activity survived, but it did not attempt to establish itself at Herod's residence. The Teacher of Righteousness was put to death, but his community established itself in the Judean desert. The fate of the followers of the Samaritan prophet, the followers of Theudas and those of the Egyptian prophet are known. It is not certain what the fate of Judas the Galilean was, but he does not seem to have established a movement with continuous leadership in Jerusalem. Josephus records that two of his sons were crucified by order of the Procurator, Tiberius Alexander, at the time that the entire country came under direct Roman rule. I do not find in any of this grounds to explain the relationship between the violent fate of Jesus in Jerusalem and the relative freedom of the leaders of a Jesus movement in the same city."
"Jerusalem, unlike Damascus or the cities in Paul's eventual itinerary, had a Jewish majority. The social situation was accordingly much less volatile. Also, in the course of the four decades until the destruction of the Second Temple, the Sanhedrin had other noisily apocalyptic popular movements and living messianic preachers to worry about."
"On the other hand, I cannot imagine that preaching messianic claims for Jesus in the Jerusalem where he was executed would have constituted a less volatile situation. We should remember that it was Rome that 'took care' with dispatch of popular apocalyptic movements and living messianic preachers. For their part, the Jewish ruling classes would have had both means and reason to take more forceful action than they did against Galileans now established in Jerusalem who claimed to be founded upon a sovereignty that had been vindicated by God against the judgment and position of authority of the ruling priests." Yet as we have seen, according to Acts, the Apostles met at the Temple daily and appeared to have based the center of their operations there (despite gospel accounts of Jesus' violent opposition to the institution). The Temple had a large public courtyard where Jews and gentiles were allowed to gather freely. Apparently, the apostles continued to preach there with relative impunity for three decades until the death of James in 62 C.E.
"...There is no evidence of Roman intervention or requests for Roman intervention; nor is there evidence that the chief priests sought from Rome authority to act against the movement in Jerusalem or Judea. But that ought to raise serious doubts about the messianic orientation of the community in Jerusalem, i.e., the public proclamation of Jesus as a divinely appointed ruler nullifying the actions of Roman and Jewish authorities against him and demonstrating their illegitimacy. It should also make one far less inclined to suppose that the Gospel Passion narratives constitute sources from which one can extract and reconstruct the historical circumstances and reasons for the death of Jesus"
(2) Paul's Mission in Asia Minor
In "Acts 5:36, prior to Paul's appearance on the Christian Jewish scene, we see the name of Theudas who had claimed to be a messiah. History tells us that this Theudas was killed approximately the year 46 C.E. If we assume that Christianity began in the year 33 C.E., then we can conclude that prior to the entrance of Paul, post-crucifixion Christianity was in existence for some 13 years. Paul fills in the rest, in the book of Galatians."
Baranbus and Paul initially had some success in preaching to synagogues in Asia Minor and winning converts.
Baranbus and Paul began to meet with increasing hostility in the diaspora community.
"It seems...likely that Jews of synagogue communities of the mixed Western urban centers would have reason to fear repercussions because of Christ communities that were aggressively engaged in uprooting Gentiles from idolatrous practices, i.e., from longstanding social, economic and cultural traditions."
"...It takes some careful reading to determine what Jews were persecuting the Christians: Acts 13:45 tells us something about them. They were Jews who were jealous; and they were slanderers, who contradicted what was spoken by Paul."
"Acts 14:5 and 14:19 indicate that again these particular Jews were Sadducees. These verses contains a reference to 'stoning', and this was not done by Pharisees; in fact, such 'vigilante' acts would be considered murder by Torah Law as taught by Pharisees."
"Even a cursory reading of the written Torah shows that Torah Law requires a trial before judges and a minimum of two qualified witnesses before capital punishment could be administered. (Deuteronomy 19:15-16). Christianity now had two enemies: Sadducees and Gentiles faithful to Herod's Roman Empire." Herod Agrippa I began his crackdown on the early church when the Jewish Christians in Antioch sent assistance to Jews in Judea beleaguered by the Romans.
"In consequence there was a ready wish to break up the closed circle living at Jerusalem and to achieve greater success through settlement elsewhere. James 'the brother of the Lord' remained behind, but the center of the movement was shifted to Antioch in Syria."
(3 Agrippa as Messiah
"...King Herod Agrippa I...won the unanimous support of all Jewish parties and other Semitic leaders for a revolution that was only aborted by his sudden fatal illness during the reign of the Emperor Claudius. Although Josephus did not say so, there is good reason to speculated that Agrippa, who was born in Bethlehem and had been to Egypt, believed himself the Messiah and formed his anti-Roman coalition by winning his allies to that belief."
There are other parallels between Jesus and Agrippa. Both were born late in the reign of King Herod the Great. Agrippa descended from the royal Maccabean Princess Mariamne.(and as was commonly rumored, Joseph, Prime Minister of Israel). He was the eldest surviving male child of the Maccabean Line and as such he was the only rightful heir to the throne of Israel.
Josephus' account of this event is more restrained.
| ||||||||||||||