Khirbat Qumran
Discoveries by the Dead SeaThe Essene Controversy(1) Settlements, Estates and Fortresses
Date Palms and Balsam
"Balsam was a medicinal herb as well as used for incense and perfume. The Essenes were known as herbalists."
Qumran, in Feshkha, Ain el Ghuweir, En-gedi, and Ain Boqeq.were occupied during the Roman period which "suggests there is a pattern typical for this area of successive occupations....All, including Qumran, show clear evidence of industrial use which was very probably connected with perfume manufacture."
Ein Gedi Dr. Hirschfeld bases his opinion that Ein Gedi was the original site of the Essenes on a passage from Pliny.
"...En Gedi was famous for its palms whereas the nearest palms to Qumran were a few kilometers south; the higher sea level at the turn of the era put Qumran much closer to the sea, yet Pliny talks of the settlement being out of range of the harm from the sea."
"Tiny cells only large enough to house one man each point to an abstinent and austere existence. What seems to be a mikveh, or Jewish ritual bath, lends credence to his theory as well, according to Hirschfeld...Moreover, the excavation turned up no evidence of animal bones -- suggesting vegetarianism, which would have been highly unusual at the time."
"The spartan cluster evokes comparison to the lauras, or clusters of Christian hermits, that dotted other parts of the Judean Desert in the Byzantine period a few centuries later. The month-long excavation produced no finds, except for a few pottery shards and part of a tiny glass bottle..."
- Associated Press, January 26, 1998
"The excavated site, at the foot of the cliffs rearing over Ein Gedi, is 200 meters higher in elevation than the village and about a kilometer distant on foot. In antiquity, the terraced slopes between the site and the village were planted with balsam, which produced a rare and expensive perfume highly valued in the Roman world. Balsam was grown only at Ein Gedi and Jericho. Alongside the excavated cells are two pools from the same period, which collected water from one of the springs issuing from the bottom of the cliffs. The water was used to irrigate the agricultural terraces."
Other Residences The archaeologistUzi Dahari is currently excavating a site of one-man stone huts on a cliff similar to those at Ein Gedi about 20 miles away.
"Dahari's site is located in the cliffs south of Wadi Kidron, between Ein Gedi and Qumran--that is, closer to Qumran than to Ein Gedi. The site includes more than ten cells from the first century CE. His excavation found many coins from the first revolt against the Romans. There is no central building nor any Jewish baths or water installations, so he does not think that this site served the Essenes, but perhaps refugees from the first revolt."
In the winter of 1995-96 "Hanan Eshel of Bar-I lan University and Magen Broshi of the Israel Museum, under the auspices of Bar-Ilan University, the Israel Museum, and the Israel Exploration Society...investigated three previously unexplored artificial caves near Qumran . The presence of dishes, cooking pots, and storage jars indicates that these caves were inhabited during the Second Temple Period. The excavators also discovered a tent neighborhood north of Qumran, with complete vessels identical to those found in the settlement, and coins of the first century C.E.
(2) Khirbat Qumran
The Myth of the Scriptorium
John Allegro, "a Semitic philologist, would see a clear root-meaning to the word 'Qumran'. He describes its origins and states that it would have been called 'Gimron' at the time of Jesus and James."
Recent findings are forcing archaeologists and historians to revise earlier theories that Qumran served as a "scriptorium" (a large writing room with benches) and communal center for the sectarians such as the Essenes.
"R. de Vaux, the excavator of Qumran, originally thought that the settlement had been destroyed by a fire sometime before the massive earthquake in 31 B.C.E. (Josephus, Ant 15.121-,47; War 1.370-80).' Later he attributed the destruction to the earthquake and a subsequent fire. It is more likely, however, that the devastation had already occurred, either through the invasion of the Parthians (40/39 B.C.E.)' or as a result of the struggle of the Hasmonean Antigonus against Herod the Great (40-37 B.C.E.). Resettlement began between 4 and 1 B.C.E. during the early part of the reign (4 B.C.E.-6 C.E.) of Archelaus (Mt 2:22). It is striking that the period when no one lived at Qumran is covered by the reign of Herod the Great (37-4 B.C.E.). Even more astonishing is that according to Josephus (Ant 15.373-78) Herod favored the Essenes. Josephus attributes this preference both to the fulfillment of a prophecy made by Manaemos the Essene that Herod would ascend his throne and to Herod's own hatred of the Hasmoneans. Scholars have raised the possibility that the Essenes inhabited the Holy City during a period when the political climate was in their favor.
"Probably taken from the libraries and synagogues of Jerusalem, the [Dead Sea] scrolls represent many ages and traditions of Hebrew writing, with their contradictions, variants and repetitions. The theory of the Essene scriptorium makes a romantic tale; but, unfortunately, little sense."
"...Pauline Donceel-Voute...argues that the principal evidence for the scriptorium - the plastered 'tables' - points rather to a Roman-period dining room, or triclinium. The Romans did not sit down to eat, but instead reclined on cushioned couches. During the years of the Second-Temple period, the Jews came to do likewise. She says the tables were actually couches."
A Judean Fortress?
"...The finds from Khirbat Qumran show that it was originally built as a Judean fortress at some time between the ninth and seventh centuries BC; that it had been fortified for the last time a century or so before Christ and finally destroyed, perhaps by an earthquake, after a siege in which some of the building walls had been sapped. Roman arrowheads found in the ashes suggest that this sack of Qumran took place during the Jewish rebellion of AD 66-70 as the legions had traveled down the western shore of the Dead Sea."
In the graves at Qumran, "burnt bones were among the skeletal remains Approximately 10 percent of the skeletons, in addition, had broken bones. There were further indications of a post-battle, military cemetery, installed - because of the practical necessity of quick burial -close to the site that had been defined."
"The current issue of _Revue de Qumran_ (June 1999) has a report from some German scientists on study of de Vaux's 1956 Qumran cemetery skeletons (which were recently found after all these years). The article is Rohrer-Ertl et al, 'Uber die Graberfelder von Khirbet Qumran, Insbesondere die Funde der Campagne 1956', pp. 3-46. The authors concluded after study of six of the skeletons that the cemetery cemetery consisted of (quoting from the English abstract) 'individuals of all ages at death and both sexes'; also that they were 'part of a pre-industrial ruling class, that is they didn't earn their living by physical work'; and finally that they ate little or no bread. De Vaux had reported women in the cemetery although they were categorized as exceptional and statistically minor. In the forthcoming Dead Sea Discoveries (Dec 1999) Joan Taylor has an article citing new data saying not only that the number of women in the cemetery was greater than de Vaux's picture (this may be a reference to the work of Rohrer-Ertl above)--but also that de Vaux minimized the incidence of women already suggested from the old data, the data he had, through the influence of the Essene sect interpretation. However apparently Joe Zias gave a presentation at SBL in Boston suggesting the opposite...that there was no evidence of women in the cemetery, also citing new data!"
The two fortresses of Qumran and Macherus "on either side of the Dead Sea, within direct sight of each other, could mutually communicate by either fire signals or carrier pigeon, and this way correspondence with Jerusalem could be readily maintained. In time of need troops could be sent straight across the sea to Macherus by boat from landing situated near Khirbet Qumran. The boats employed for this purpose were perhaps of the type used in the Dead Sea as depicted in the Madaba map (sixth century A.D.), which had both oars and sails and could generate considerable speed on the highly buoyant waters of the sea. Khirbet Qumran was thus an integral part of the defense system of encircling fortifications designed to ward off attacks against the capital and the heartland of Judea; and it also served as a stronghold, in times of both peace and war, to guard the route carrying salt, balsam, asphalt, and sugar from the Dead sea region to the capital."
Broken Continuity
"That Qumran was destroyed in 68 or 70 or so is agreed. But before that, back to c.100 BCE, there appear to have been only two physical upheavals. The 31 BCE earthquake, which most agree caused some damage, and an intentional destruction dating approximately within 7 to 3 BCE. The latter possibly resulted from the agitation and perhaps paranoia of Herod the Great's last years or from the unrest following his death. (For example, perhaps some temporary gang sought the wealth that the Tyrian silver coins attests to.) But in both cases Qumran was apparently rebuilt without much delay. Evidently it was not considered a fortress nor the inhabitants soldiers. In the war of c. 40 BCE, Ein Gedi (which was fortified) was destroyed, as archaeology shows. This is confirmed, IMO, by the source in Pliny from c. 15 BCE describing Qumran/Ein Feshkha then as peaceful and Ein Gedi as still in ashes or like a graveyard."
"What we find is a drastic reduction of coins from soon after the reign of Alexander Jannaeus [c. 65 BCE] only picking up again under the procurators [c. 6 CE] ....Such a gap of occupation would make it likely that there was no relationship between those who occupied the site during Hasmonean times and those during the middle part of the following century. There may for example have been a state installation during the Hasmonean period, justifying the costly water system and the defensive tower, then under the procurators a Roman style farm/villa.
A Rural Manor House?
Hirschfeld, "basing himself on his excavation of a similar complex [to that at Ein Gedi] near Zichron Ya'acov, contends that Qumran was a [fortified] rural manor house which oversaw agricultural cultivation at the nearby springs of Ein Fash'ha."
Owners of the villa were "members of the ruling class of the Herodian kingdom....who enjoyed the fruits of the Roman occupation."
"Hirschfeld bases his argument that Qumran is a wealthy Roman-style manor on a comparison of its architecture with other nearby Roman villas from the same period. All the sites share a tower and a residential area surrounding a courtyard.
Purfume bottle(s?) excavated at Qumram also support the thesis that Qumran was an Agrarian center "and the inhabitants may have been cultivists and processors of Balsam. This would tie in the En-Gedi site where the Balsam plants were cultivated to Qumran, perhaps where it was processed and bottled."
The Dead Sea Scrolls
Dating the Scrolls
"The Carbon 14 dating has pretty much settled the matter of the dating of the scrolls [to the 1st and 2nd century B.C.E.]. Also texts such as the Nuchem Pesher has names of historical figures which date it in the 2nd century B.C.E." "Scholars with a special interest in obtaining carbon 14 dates for particular texts because of the documents' contents suggested which scrolls from the Judean Desert might be dated. Three scrolls came from Qumran Cave 1, twelve scrolls from Cave 4 and three from other sites in the Judean desert. Scholars and researchers agreed to take no samples which might cause any significant damage to the scrolls themselves. Only milligrams of a sample are needed for radiocarbon age dating by accelerator mass spectrometer technique. All samples were taken from ragged edges of top or bottom margins, and photographs record the exact locations of the pieces taken for analysis. Some samples from date-bearing documents were added as control texts, and the identity and ages of these materials were not revealed to the UA science team in advance. One of the control samples -- a sample of the Book of Isaiah scroll from Qumran Cave 1 -- previously had been radiocarbon age dated at ETH-Zurich in 1990-91, and its identity, too, was unknown to the UA scientists during their tests. The new test results agree with actual written dates on the dated documents and with the Zurich radiocarbon results obtained earlier. The new test results also confirm the reliability of paleography, a comparative study of script. "'The major importance of the new carbon 14 examinations is that they suggest dates which are very close to the dates suggested by paleographers,' said Emanuel Tov [Editor-in-Chief of the Dead Sea Scrolls Publication Project, Hebrew University]." "'Some of the newly analyzed texts are of central importance for our understanding of the Qumran community', he added, citing four such texts that concern various aspects of the Qumran legal system. Another text, the well-known pesher or commentary on Habakkuk, which is on display at the Shrine of the Book, is of fundamental importance for the historical reconstruction of the origins of the Qumran sect. The new radiocarbon dates show the manuscript was written before 43 BCE -- contrary to theory that says there was an early Christian connection to the Qumran sect.
"The UA team radiocarbon dated the famous Book of Isaiah scroll at between 335 BCE and 122 BCE. Paleographers had dated this scroll at between 150 - 125 BCE. The team also analyzed the commentary on the Psalms (UA radiocarbon dated at between 22 CE and 78 CE); the Messianic Apocalypse that paleographers date at 100 BCE to 80 BCE (UA radiocarbon dated at between 35 BCE and 59 CE); the Exodus scroll of the Bible written in ancient Hebrew script that paleographers date at between 100 BCE and 25 BCE (UA radiocarbon tests date it between 159 BCE and 16 CE); and an inscribed round leather patch with holes that was attached to the Exodus scroll. Paleographers date the patch between 50 BCE and 50 CE (UA radiocarbon dated the patch at from 98 BCE to 13 CE). 'Inscribed patches of this sort have been described in ancient Jewish writings', Tov said." There still remains some dispute over the results of the Carbon 14 dating of the scrolls.
"The historical references, especially in the Habakkuk Pesher, the Temple Scroll and the Damascus Document clearly contradict any C-14 reports, which cannot be calibrated that precisely, anyway. For one thing, C-14 only measures approximately when the material was produced, NOT when somebody wrote on it. As Eisenman points out, C-14 gave a 4th century BC/CE dating of the Kohath, which is most likely a 1st century BC/CE document. One papyrus with an actual known date of 135 AD/CE was dated to 231-332 AD/CE and another with an actual known date of 128 AD/CE was dated to 86-314 AD/CE (quite a range!)." Traces of castor oil (used to brighten the texts on the leather) was found on 4QpPs, one of five "outliers", scrolls dated by radiocarbon analysis which show later dates than the bulk of the others.
"John Allegro, John Strugnell, and Frank Cross have all explained that they regularly cleaned the Scrolls with castor oil in order both to get the dust off and to bring up some readings. They could not at the time have known that this would interfere with future C-14 studies, as, in their day, radiocarbon analysis required such enormous quantities of material that direct testing of the manuscripts themselves was out of the question; hence they had no reason to be cautious in this respect." This finding makes the date anomalous: it may or may not reflect a true date. In addition to castor oil, nicotine contamination by smokers handling the scroll material has to be taken into account.
"Little reliance should be placed on an individual 14C date to provide an estimate of age for a given object, structure, feature, or stratigraphic unit. A critical judgment of the ability of 14C data to infer actual age can best be made with a suite of determinations . Concordance of values on different sample types from well-defined stratigraphic contexts provides one of the strongest arguments for the accuracy of age assessments based on 14C values."
Unique wide-mouthed jars which held many of the scrolls are found only the region around Jericho and the Dead Sea. They have been used to attempt to determine when the scrolls were deposited in the caves. De Vaux, the archaeologist who excavated Khirbat Qumran, found a similar wide-mouthed jar in the ruins there.
"A piece especially important is the jar of Fig. 2, 4, found intact and buried in the ground at the northwest corner of room 2. It was empty and covered by a slab (or square) of chalky bituminous substance which covered the paved floor. It is identical to those which were recovered from the first cave of the manuscripts and which were found in great number in other caves explored in 1952 in the region of Qumran." A number of scholars argue that the jar (and others installed in the corners) date to Period 1b (before the 31 B.C.E. destruction of Qumran) when the paved floor was built. However, there are a number of good reasons to date the jar to Period II (after Qumran's second destruction in 9/8 B.C.E.). (a) Some first century C.E. coins were found on top, around, and within the jar.
(b) A jar of the same type "in North Jordan [Abila] was found in a tomb context ranging later than Qumran....It was found in a salvage dig, with inkwells (one of which, which was photographed, resembles Qumran ceramic inkwells). Records of that dig, apparently, are
lost." (c) Similar scroll jars were discovered at Masada, Herod's mountain retreat seized by the fanatic Sicarii in 66 C.E.
A Wide Diversity
"The Biblical manuscripts found in the Qumran, are distributed as follows: 60% Proto-Masoretic texts, 20% Qumran style manuscripts, 10% Nonaligned texts, 5% Proto-Samaritan texts, and 5% Septuagintal type texts. Further more, the Qumran style manuscripts have their bases in the proto-Masoretic texts. The Masoretic type texts were dominant in the time of the Hasmonean period (about 160 B.C.E.). [p. 172 of Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls by Shiffman]
"...According to Frank Moore Cross (another DSS scholar) there are at least 3 'families' of texts at Qumran : the MT 'family', the 'Egyptian' family, and a 'Palestinian' family . The 'Egyptian' version which, among other things, has a different version of Jeremiah, became the basis for the LXX. The 'Palestinian ' became the basis for the Samaritan version. The MT variety was the ancestor of what we use today--although even within these 'families' there was sometimes variation. We do not know which version was being used by, say, the Sadducees of the Temple sect, or even which the Essenes themselves used. The Jewish community at Alexandria evidently used the Egyptian 'family' or the LXX."
"The 'biblical' library of Qumran represents a fluid stage of the biblical text. Those documents show no influence of the rabbinic recension of the canon, the direct ancestor of the traditional Hebrew Bible. The scrolls help to place both the Pharisaic text and the canon in the era of Hillel, roughly the time of Jesus. In their selection of canonical books, the rabbis excluded those attributed to prophets or Patriarchs before Moses (e.g., the Enoch literature, works written in the name of Abraham and other Patriarchs). They traced the succession of prophets from Moses to figures of the Persian period. Late works were excluded, with the exception of Daniel, which, the rabbis presumably, attributed to the Persian period."
"...While the scrolls consisted of works of literature, none of them [other than the Copper Scroll] seemed to show signs of an original author in the act of writing down his thoughts; none, that is, could be considered which is properly called a literaryautograph....The scrolls...were apparently all smoothly written copies of literary works, made by scribes, and -judging by the nature of the scribal errors - sometimes two or more steps removed from the original authors' texts, now vanished, upon which they were based."
"One of the most remarkable finds to result from these explorations [into the caves] was that of phylacteries (Hebrew, tefillin) discovered in several caves. until the present day, strictly observant Jews attach leather thongs to small capsules, containing the text of Exodus 13.1-16, Deuteronomy 6.4-9 and 11.13-21, and bind these capsules to forehead and arm in literal fulfillment of the Deuteronomic injunction..."
"...The texts of most of the [approximately 30] phylacteries found in the caves - published by several scholars in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1979s - showed no consistency with one another.", varying in both the length and selection of texts.
"There is no basis in the evidence that I can see to assume continuity of a single group from early 1st B.C.E. to the 1st C.E., to assume two long major periods of habitation, or to put more specific dates on habitation periods other than an AJ-55 B.C.E. phase on one end and the 60's CE on the other end (and a moment in time attested at 8 B.C.E.). Continuity of a single group through all of this seems to me so seriously improbable that it does not seem to me to merit even the status of reasonable conjecture."
"Over fifty different handwritings were represented in this first Qumran cave alone -where, according to the notion of a sect living at Qumran and the corresponding identification of one building there as a scriptorium, one would have rather expected to find several groups of texts, each written by a much smaller number of scribes, and with a relatively large number of texts done by a single scribe. Such was the situation on the island of Elephantine, in upper Egypt, where...Aramaic manuscripts of the fifth century B.C. were discovered many years ago. Michael Wise of the University of Chicago, an incisive interpreter of the Qumran texts and their cultural milieu, has pointed out that, by any reasonable estimate, the number of inhabitants at Elephantine was perhaps fifty times the estimated number of 'sectarians' who have been claimed to live at Khirbet Qumran, and that nevertheless the Elephantine inhabitants 'relied upon only a dozen or so scribes. And this total served over a period of three or four scribes at the most could have been active there in a given generation."
Additional Caches
"Those charged with hiding artifacts of importance would clearly have sought to do so in areas the Romans did not yet control; but already by the summer of A.D. 68, the only such territory was that portion of Judea lying to the east and south of the city..."
"It was only after the fall of the capital [70 C.E.] that the Romans captured several known fortresses of the region, i.e., Herodium, Macherus, and Masada." Qumran was likely captured during this time "when the Roman troops under Lucilius Bassus began their entrance into the Judean Wilderness, the last remaining area of Jewish resistance." Two significant finds of hidden scrolls in the neighborhood of Jericho (northwest of the Dead Sea) were recorded long before the famous discovery at Qumran in 1947.
"...Toward the middle of the third century A.D., the learned and prolific church father Origen had made use of a Greek translation of the Bible that, so he stated, had been found 'together with other Hebrew and Greek books in a jar near Jericho'. [Origen added three columns to his Psalter - making it an Enniapla. He is quoted as stating that the last (the third of the three additions and the ninth of the total) came from the jar.] Origen wrote that this find had been made during the reign of Antoninus Severus (i.e., Caracalla) who ruled from A.D. 211 to 217."
"...Neither Origen nor Timotheus actually state that the finds were made near the shore of the Dead Sea, which is much closer to Qumran than Jericho...Origen in particular, who lived for some years in Palestine and was intimately acquainted with its geography, would never have spoken so vaguely." The Copper Scroll, discovered near Qumran in 1955, alludes to the possibility of still more undiscovered caches of scrolls (and treasure!) in the wilderness near Jericho.
"The listing of riverbeds, water systems, and gorges described in this scroll as hiding places forms a word map of the complex system of wadis leading out from Jerusalem though the Judean Wilderness and toward the Dead Sea. The great treasure described as hidden there, and the scrolls and 'writings' associated with them in several columns of the text, are thus geographically traceable directly back to Jerusalem." Texts similar to the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in the mountaintop fortress of Masada, most likely brought in by refugees fleeing Jerusalem during the Jewish War (66 C.E. to 70 C.E.).
"In the ruins were found, beside many artifacts of the period, inscribed coins, jars with names of their owners, ostraca, and most importantly, fragments of at least fifteen Hebrew texts."
A room projecting from the double wall surrounding the fortress may have served as a synagogue for the Sicarii. It had "four tiers of plastered benches around its sides, and places for pillars in the middle of the room. It was nearly the same size as the hall at Herodium, about 15 meters/50 X 12 meters/40 feet." Fragments from the Book of Ezekiel, chapter 37, the vision of the valley of dry bones and the last part of the Book of Deuteronomy were found at the site of the alleged synagogue.
In addition to the room at Masada and a few other locations, texts were also found "in the areas of Masada that had been mostly occupied by the Zealots and the refugees from Jerusalem. They included a fragment of Leviticus, fragments of two copies of Psalms, portions (twenty-six fragments) of the original Hebrew text of the Wisdom of Ben Sira (= Ecclesiasticus), fragments of two copies of Jubilees, fragments of several otherwise unknown literary texts, some documentary papyri fragments in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek, and, most remarkably, a part of the so-called Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice (known also as the 'Angelic Liturgy'). Manuscript fragments of this latter work, but in other handwritings, had also been found, mirabile dictu, in Qumran Caves 4 and 11 more than a decade earlier."
"The Qumran manuscripts were, by the evidence, part of yet larger collections of scrolls, hidden away at some time during the first century A.D. in various places throughout the Judean Wilderness, including Masada, the caves near Khirbet Qumran, and areas near Jericho. Artifacts of great material value quite obviously from Jerusalem had been buried in the same general area and at the same time..."
Resemblances to Rabbinic Judaism Unlike the lunar calendar used by the priesthood of the Temple, the Book of Jubilees insists on a solar calendar.
"The Jewish lunar calendar was believed to be erroneous by comparison with solar calendar of Jubilees putting the heavenly sabbath and other rituals out of alignment because the 'great eternal light which for ever and ever is named the sun' appointed the heavenly course of time. Many of these factors are consistent with Persian influence, including the sun worship and the conflict between order and disorder."
"The calendars also show a wide variety of practices among the intertestamental Jews....What we have in most of them is a system of computation of the yearly cycles that was slightly more primitive than the particular lunisolar system eventually adopted by rabbinic Judaism."
Interpreting the Scrolls
"So the authors of these commentaries identified themselves, their leaders, their enemies and foreign powers with figures in the biblical prophesies."
"A commentary on Isaiah interprets the sentence as follows: 'this concerns the priests and the people who laid the foundations of the council of the Community...the congregation of his elect will be like a sapphire among stones.'"
"The Dead Sea Scrolls consist of fragments from many manuscripts, however, some of the most interesting among them are the Pesher texts. The Pesher texts are strings of interpretations of Biblical verses compiled by the most knowledgeable among the Jews. The word itself is derived from the Hebrew root word p-sh-r, which means, 'to explain'. The texts consist of Biblical passages followed by the words pesher ha-davar 'the interpretation of the matter is', and then the interpretation itself.
The pesher is a system in which "the scroll writer takes an Old Testament book such as the minor prophet Habakkuk, which deals with events in 600 BC, when the armies of the Babylonians were marching towards Judea, inspiring fear and terror. He goes through it verse by verse, and after quoting each passage adds 'Its pesher is...', then explains that it is really about events in his own time."
|