Transfiguration - Jesus With Moses and Elijah
Jesus in Jerusalem"Rejoice...Your King Comes to You"(1) Transfiguration or Royal Ritual?
"At baptism and on the mount of transfiguration Jesus is acclaimed by a heavenly voice as Son of God (Mk 1:9-11; 9:28). As in the Scrolls, the vision of the heavenly figures and the transformation of the appearance of Jesus build on the prophetic tradition which in Judaism became what is known as Merkabah mystical experience."
"Peter's 'confession' - 'You are the Messiah' - followed six days later by the Transfiguration, is a disguised and/or confused recollection of a proclamation of Jesus's kingship followed by an anointing/coronation ceremony, complete with tabernacles and shimmering white robes, on Mount Hermon."
"Making the Sinai tabernacle was the first great act of obedience to the Law; therefore Peter's proposal is - to begin a new legal servitude to Jesus, the Law (Moses), and the Prophets (Elijah). To prevent this, the supreme God, the father, comes down in his cloud and implicitly abolishes the Law by declaring Jesus' unique status as Son. When the cloud lifts, Law and Prophets are gone, Jesus alone remains to direct his disciples."
The reference to the "three shelters" suggests an association with the temporary shelters built by celebrants during the festival of Tabernacles.
"Only Moses' face shone, Jesus blazed all over, even his garments (Ex. 34.30ff.; Mk. 9.2f.p.)." That the revelation of the Son replaces the giving of the Law, is the essential message of the redactor and is probably secondary."
It has been theorized that this passage was derived from the account of Jesus' transfiguration in the Cross Gospel. Episcopal Biship John Shelby Spong writes that the transfiguration was a Christian attempt to wrap the themes of the Feast of Dedication.
"...In typical midrashic style, the Jews began to weave around this festival details out of their sacred history that demonstrated that the light of God always came to rest on that place where heaven and earth seemed to come together, namely, the place where sacrifices that ascended into the very presence of God were offered." In Jewish foldlore, Moses, Elijah and Enoch all ascended to the heavenly realm while still alive.
"...All three synoptics have in mind Moses: (a) shining face on descent Exod 34:29-35; (b) ascent up mountain after six days (cf. Exod 24.16)." Moses was transfigured as he returned from the cloud of God atop Mount Sinai.
"Jesus, like Moses, went up the mountain with three named associates. He, like Moses, entered the cloud of God. The Shekinah, or light of God, then came and rested on him. He was transformed, his clothes were translucent [Exodus 28:1 ff. where Aaron's clothes were transformed into a radiant glory], and suddenly the Jewish Feast of Dedication had a Christian emphasis."
Luke (9:28-36) also provides an account of the transfiguration "in which the light of God that once came to the Temple was now portrayed as descending on Jesus. Unlike Mark and Matthew, however, Luke related that story to the Book of Numbers [as his gospel followed the Torah through the Jewish liturgical year]. In Numbers (16:42 ff.) we are told that the cloud of God covered the tent of meeting and the glory of the Lord appeared upon that meeting place. It was the first experience of the light of God coming to the worship center of Israel."
(2) Proclaiming the "Revolution" Kingship and Revolution
"The popular Israelite tradition of kingship [had] three principal characteristics: kingship was constituted by popular election or anointing; it was conditional on the king's maintenance of a certain social policy and the anointing of a new king was generally a revolutionary action." The association of kingship with revolutionary activity can be traced back to the time when King Saul refused to retire and drove David into banditry:
This revolutionary activity was seen in less favorable light by the Greeks.
Later, Josephus, writing for a Roman audience, also equated revolutionary activity with banditry.
"...Those whom Josephus calls LHSTAI did not just have small bands of like the James boys but attracted rather substantial public followings. E.g., the shepherd Athronges, the populist candidate to succeed Herod the Great as king (Ant. 17.278-80). Each of his 4 brothers had their own band, which in turn attracted a 'great crowd' while Athronges paraded as king and judge over his own court."
"...It is clear that before, during, and after Jesus, the Palestinian peasantry was in a state of political turmoil, Gurr's [Why Men Rebel] technical term for unrest that is 'relatively spontaneous, unorganized...with substantial popular participation, including violent political strikes, riots, political clashes, and localized rebellions."
Internecine Strife
"The attack has nothing to do with faith but with power. The attack is on the Mediterranean family's axis of power, which sets father and mother over son, daughter, and daughter-in-law." The quote is derived from a passage attributed to the prophet Micah.
It also reflects the apocalyptic vision of the First Book of Enoch.
"Texts tell us of 'magical practice and curse and incantation and stoke and evil eye and evil spells...the spells of the mother and the daughter...the spells of the daughter-in-law and the mother-in-law."
While a devastating civil war did occur two generations after Jesus' death, during the First Roman-Jewish War 66-70 C.E., Josephus does not describe the fighting as fratricidal. Instead brother fought alongside brother and father alongside son. These passages are more descriptive of the bloody in-fighting within the Maccabean royal family which lead to the Roman annexation of Judea in 63 B.C.E.
Subversive Innuendo
"Though there is no evidence that publicly challenge Antipas, there is a lot of politically subversive innuendo in many of his [Jesus'] aphorisms." Mahlon provides the following examples:
(3) The Feast of Tabernacles
"Normally, between the third and fourth Sabbaths of Tishri, the major harvest festival of Tabernacles, or Sukkot, was observed. This was an eight-day celebration set in Jerusalem. It was probably the best-loved, the most fun, the least somber, and the most anticipated festival of the Jews. The Jewish people build temporary dwelling or booths for this celebration, to recall to consciousness their homeless days of wandering in the wilderness." - John Shelby Spong, Liberating the Gospels, p. 62
"Until his passion (his suffering and death, Jesus' decisive time has not yet arrived. Jesus' time is when he will be glorified (12:23; cf. 2:4). But it is always the world's time: the world's time is a time of darkness; those who do not recognize Jesus as the one sent from God stand under perpetual judgment."
The transfiguration "was followed by what was attempted to be a royal progress to Jerusalem to make an appearance in the Temple. The 70 disciples who went out to prepare the way may have been preparing for a royal tour after the visit to Jerusalem."
Jesus "sets his face steadfastly to go to Jerusalem to prepare for his individual act of atonement as Israel's king. This act is to take place at the Jewish freedom festival, the Passover, in the spring of the year; but the journey to Jerusalem just mentioned [John 7:8-10] is at the festival of Tabernacles in the previous autumn. Uniquely, Jesus remains in Jerusalem for about three months [according to John]." Permanent Living Water
"...This celebration [Tabernacles] also featured the note of the coming of God's messiah and it spoke of a gathering of the nations of the world in Jerusalem. In the Tabernacles tradition, these foreigners were thought first to have gathered as enemies in warfare. There were destined, however, to be defeated by God's messiah, and so, in defeat, they remained to worship the Lord of Hosts. They also expected to be the recipients of endless water, which would be a sign that the Kingdom of God had come. This permanent living water, in time, came to be identified with the spirit of the living God, the presence of which was also a sign that the Kingdom of God had come."
"In the Old Testament, 'living water' denotes 'running water.' The concept of 'living water' as salvific is not found in the Jewish Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha."
"...In the midst of the celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles during which it was said that the Messiah would someday return to his Temple, John said that Jesus stood up and declared himself to be the source of living water."
Compare with the parallel in the Gospel of Thomas, which has a Gnostic ring to it.
For early Christians, drinking the living water brought spiritual intoxication.
Palm Leaves and Psalm 118
"...Tabernacles, or Booths (Sukkot), had as one of its characteristic motifs the activity of pilgrims walking around the altar in the Temple in procession while waving a bundle of greenery made up of the leafy branches of willow, myrtle, and palm trees. This bundle of greenery was called a lulab. While those branches were being waved, the liturgy of Tabernacles called for the worshipers to chant the words of Psalm 118, which was the traditional Psalm of the fall festival."
"Particularly important in desert oases, date palms were a main source of food; even the leaves and trunk fiber were used for shelter and rope. Palm branches were used as decorative motifs by the Hasmonean priest-kings in their building activities. The first local coin with a palm branch was minted in Galilee by Herod Antipas in the mid-20's CE. The Jews of the First Revolt against Rome (66-73 CE) and Second Revolt (132-135 CE) used palm trees as symbols of their independence, with the insignia 'Year One of the Redemption of Israel.' Further evidence for this meaning is found on the 'Judea Capta' coin minted by Titus to show the end of Jewish nationalism after the fall of Jerusalem. John's gospel mentioning palm branches during Jesus' triumphal entry into Jerusalem (Jn. 12.13) would have been understood as a sign of Jewish nationalism. The crowds were wanting to show Jesus they were willing to put themselves under his authority for [the sake of] the nation... Though a military symbol at the time, modern Christians can perhaps see in it a symbol of the Lordship of Christ."
"To put this data into a context of time and place, we need to note that there were no leafy branches in March (Nisan) in the land of the Jews, so this story begins immediately to totter if read in a literal time sequence as a prelude to Passover." The willow and myrtle trees may not have been in leaf but palm trees maintain their leaves year round.
"Jesus made his triumphal entry not during Passover but during the Feast of Tabernacles, in the fall. There are numerous signs pointing to this, including the palm leaves, the use of the word 'Hosanna' which has ritual significance at Succoth, the fact that the fig tree was cursed because it had no figs, and a reference to the Feast of Tabernacles in John. [The tree would still be budding in spring.] More germane is the idea that the Feast of Tabernacles is the one festival when the King would be expected to appear in the Temple, be handed the scroll, and read the 'King's paragraph' (from chapter 17 in Deuteronomy) signifying the King's duty to study and remain faithful to the Law."
(4) Royal Entry into Jerusalem
Pilgrimage to the Holy City
"Jesus is now represented as making the second formal prediction of his passion....The basic ingredient of Mark's kerygma, or proclamation, were the same as Paul's. The first formulation of the Christian message known to us is the one Paul records in 1 Cor. 15:3-4."
"Paul's formation features the death and resurrection of Jesus, just as do Mark's three predictions of Jesus. In the view of the Jesus Seminar, Mark has summarized the Christian message and placed it on the lips of Jesus as a prediction. It is therefore a prediction after the fact."
In Jesus' time, "just as today, Jerusalem was a holy city, the city of David, the city of the Temple to which every good Jew traveled at least once a year to make a sacrifice. Any pilgrim to Jerusalem was expected to make the final stages of the journey on foot as a sign of respect and devotion....Jesus, however, did the opposite." Riding the Colt
"This passage lay behind a widespread Jewish belief that the Mount of Olives would see the coming of the Messiah (see, e.g., Josephus, Jewish War, 11, 13, 5; Antiquities, XX, 8, 6). Thus, Mark's narrative has it that on the morning of the triumphal entry:"
"As Jesus draws near to Jerusalem by way of Bethany, Bethphage, and the Mount of Olives, he expresses his royal messianic authority by commandeering an ass on which to ride into Jerusalem..."
"Mark writes on the basis of a vague knowledge of Judaean geography, not knowing that one approaching Jerusalem from the east on the road from Jericho would reach first Bethany and then Bethphage, not the reverse order he indicates."
"The demand of Jesus for a donkey thus can be seen to have been carefully staged, and staged precisely at the village of Bethany where Jesus had intimate friends - the sisters Martha and Mary and their brother Lazarus - with whom he had become acquainted the previous autumn."
"...This incident is not based on general Davidic or Mosaic models known to every Jew but on a very precise verse in one single prophecy."
"Your king"" is "a reference apparently to Salmah the sacrificial summer king portrayed in the Song of Songs."
"It is only with this passage that we can understand why Mark has Jesus specify that his disciples obtain a 'colt [polon] which no one has yet ridden' (Mark 11:2)."
"In this passage, each key word is reinforced by a synonym or a parallel: rejoice//shout, Zion//Jerusalem, just and triumphant//humble and riding. But the translators of the Septuagint apparently missed the parallelism between ass//foal of an ass and instead pictured two animals--an ass and a foal. This misunderstanding becomes significant because the verse is used as a prooftext in Matthew 21:2-7, which describes Jesus' entry into Jerusalem. Jesus sends two disciples to fetch an ass and a foal 'to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet'; Matthew then quotes the passage in Zechariah and adds that the disciples did indeed bring Jesus an ass and a foal. The textual misunderstanding carried over into Christian art; some scenes of Jesus' entry into Jerusalem show him straddling two animals!"
The original verse in Mark, however, does not make this mistake.
"...John quotes or paraphrases a garbled version of Zechariah, mentioning only half of the parallelism; he also eliminates the disciples' role:"
Palm Branches and Hosannas
"In both verses, Mark has imported 'Hosanna' from the Hebrew or Aramaic text of Ps. 118 (117 LXX):25."
"The jubilant crowd pays him homage with garments, branches, and Hosannas echoing Psalms 118:25-26. In parallel phrases they bless both Jesus 'who comes in the name of the Lord' and 'the coming kingdom of our father David.' Not by accident, in the immediately preceding pericope, the cure of the blind Bartimaeus (Mark 10:46-52), Jesus was hailed as the Son of David."
"...This scene strongly recalls the triumphant purification and rededication of the Jerusalem Temple by the Hasmonean Simon Maccabeus after it had been defiled by Antiochus Epiphanes in the second century B.C.E."
"If one accepts the synoptic accounts of the triumphal entry into Jerusalem (in which Jesus seems to deliberately set up a literal fulfillment of Zech 9:9) as historical, one MIGHT argue that the historical Jesus demonstrated a 'messianic consciousness.' The problem is the Johannine account of this incident clearly specifies that the association of Jesus's entry into Jerusalem with Zech 9:9 was something that occurred in the minds of Jesus's disciples only after his crucifixion/resurrection. "
(5) Jesus as the Paschal Lamb
"After some initial activity that need not demand more than a few weeks (John 1:35-2:12), Jesus goes up to Jerusalem for the first Passover of his public ministry [AD 28] (2:13). At the time of the feeding of the five thousand we are told that the (second) Passover was near (6:4). And of course Jesus goes to Jerusalem in preparation for the (third) Passover, which, according to John, he does not live to celebrate (11:55, 12:1, 12:13:1; 18:28)." Unlike the Gospel of John, the synoptic Gospels mention only one visit by Jesus to Jerusalem, when he was crucified. Were two separate events - a royal entry at Tabernacles and Jesus' fatal visit at Passover - compounded into one? Or was the association of Jesus's passion with Passover wholly a creation of the early church to Christianize the most important Jewish holy day? The Gospel accounts of Jesus' crucifixion have strong allegorical elements tied to the annual sacrifice of the paschal lamb on Passover. Celebrated as part of the Jewish liturgical year, Easter served as the Christian counterpart to the most important of the Jewish holidays.
"In the Passover tradition, the blood of that first paschal lamb was said to have been placed on the door-posts of the Hebrew homes to protect them from the angel of death, who was sent by God in the final plague imposed upon the Egyptians, the plagues were designed to motivate the pharaoh to free the people of Israel from slavery in Egypt (Exod. 12). That angel of death was to slay the firstborn of every household in the land whose door-posts were not protected by the blood the paschal lamb."
"When Israel had a Temple, in addition to the lamb for each household, a lamb was chosen to die for the sins of the entire nation. On the 10th of Nisan, it was lead in a huge procession from Bethany to the Temple."
"Paul's suggestion in 1 Corinthians, written ten to fifteen years before the First Gospel, 'that Christ our paschal lamb has been sacrificed' (I Cor. 5:7) made the Passover connection..."
Cleansing the TempleA Profitable Monopoly Only Israelite males who are not blind or who had not come into contact with lepers or graves were allowed to enter the Temple.
"The Old Testament underscores the vast gulf between God and humanity. God is supreme, omnipotent, transcendent, and any limited contact with him puts human beings at risk. The worship instructions in a book like Leviticus remind me on a manual on handling radioactive material. Bring only spotless lambs to the tabernacle. Do not touch the Ark. Always let smoke cover it; if you look at the ark, you'll die. Never enter the most Holy Place, except for the high priest on the one permitted day of the year. On that day, Yom Kippur, fasten a rope around his ankle, and a bell, so that if he makes a mistake and dies inside, his corpse can be dragged out.
"Jerusalem was always busy with visitors and traders coming and going, so there were inns and lodging houses all over the city. In springtime, when the Passover Festival came round, the whole place became a vast camp, as pilgrims flocked in to keep the feast there. The poor set up tents and shelters outside the city walls, others paid for rooms or sleeping-spaces. According to Josephus there could be as many as three million people in Jerusalem at Passover time! All agree that this figure is too high, but pilgrims could certainty be numbered in hundreds of thousands." Recent estimates place the number of pilgrims at 350,000.
"In these days, Jerusalem was booming, about tripling its population in the next forty years (from twenty-thirty thousand inhabitants). And by far, the biggest money maker in the city was the temple: Directly or indirectly, almost everyone, here and around, was depending on it for a living; there was little else."
In the Jerusalem Temple, "the courts, most of which were closed to Gentiles, and the Inner Court, barred to all but healthy, male Jews, teemed with animals and birds on sale for sacrifices. This was the one place, reputedly on the very spot where Abraham had once stayed his hand in sacrificing his son Isaac, that animal sacrifices were still practiced within the Jewish religion. Here a man was judged on the scale of his offering, and the money used and re-used in elaborate banking transactions that had been learned from the Babylonians."
An Economic Elite
"The temple was presided over by the high priest and chief priests. They were an economic elite as well. Together with their extended families and other Aristocratic families who were frequently linked to them by marriage. they comprised one to two percent of the population, and to them flowed one half to two thirds of the agricultural production of peasants, extracted though taxes, tithes, and rent for land. The temple elites were just not only the religious elites, but also the economic and political elites of the society."
"Essentially the Temple expressed, by its very opulence, the intense separation which by now had turned the Jewish religion into a highly quarrelsome, multi-party organism. All too obvious were the fine houses of the Sadducean priestly aristocracy, controllers of the Temple's extensive financial dealings. Since 1969 Israeli archaeologist Nachman Avigad has been patiently unearthing what remains of these once very large, stone-built Graeco-roman villas with beautiful mosaic floors and frescoed walls. Whole features such as ritual mikveh for ablutions leave little doubt as to the owners' priestly occupations, there are also indications of luxurious living in evidence, such as the remains of amphorae of the finest blown glass that once held expensive imported wine. Because of the prevailing view that the only atonement for a man's sins was repentance and sacrifice - and the Temple was the only place where sacrifices could be made - they ran a valuable monopoly."
Corruption within the Priesthood
"Lack of equity in connection with the Temple probably refers to unfair and oppressive taxation and Temple polity."
"Although ostensibly describing the destruction of the First Temple, the author of this early second-century pseudepigraphon is describing the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 C.E. (see 2Bar 1:4; 32:2-4). It is significant that the priests are characterized as 'false stewards' a characterization that coheres with some of Jesus' parables (see Mt 24:45-51 and parallels; Mk 12:1-9 and parallels; Lk 16:1-8)."
"The passage is clearly directed against a wealthy and powerful priestly aristocracy. Since the passage apparently follows the demise of Herod's sons, the setting of this apocalyptic vision must be the first century C.E., and probably sometime in the 30s. If this is indeed the case, then what we have here is pre-70 evidence-possibly from the very time of Jesus - of the belief that the priestly aristocracy was corrupt."
During the Herodian and Roman periods, "some twenty-eight high priests (only two of which were from families that had any legitimate claim) held office in little more than one century (from 37 B.C.E. to 70 C.E.)."
Sectarian Alienation
"Most subordinate classes throughout most of history have rarely been afforded the luxury of open, organized, political activity. Or, better stated, such activity was dangerous, if not suicidal...For all their importance when they do occur, peasant rebellions - let alone revolutions - are few and far between. The vast majority are crushed unceremoniously....For these reasons it seemed to me more important to understand what we might call everyday forms of peasant resistance - the prosaic but constant struggle between the peasantry and those who seek to extract labor, food, taxes, rents, and interest from them. Most forms of this struggle stop well short of outright collective defiance. Here I have in mind the ordinary weapons of relatively powerless groups: foot dragging, dissimulation, desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance, slander, arson, sabotage, and so on. These...forms of class struggle...require little or no coordination or planning; they make use of implicit understandings and informal networks; they often represent a form of individual self-help; they typically avoid any direct, symbolic confrontation with authority....When such stratagems are abandoned in favor of more quixotic action, it is usually a sign of great desperation."
"In ancient Judaism sectarian alienation, whatever its origin, generally expressed itself in polemics against the central institutions of society (notably the temple), its authority figures (notably the priests), and its religious practices (notably purity, Sabbath, and marriage law). The 'cutting edge' of sectarianism was not theology but practice."
Sectarian religious alienation was most acutely felt within what has been termed the Messianic Movement in Palestine. When the Hasmoneans usurped the position of High Priest of the Temple (152 B.C.E.) from the priestly Zadok family, groups like the Yahad and later the Pharisaic Zadokites broke away and refused to recognize the authority of the Temple priesthood. The ministry of Jesus was certainly aligned with this sentiment, a hostility which was further enforced by his upbringing in the tradition of Galilean holy men who had served God without the need of temple or priesthood.
Spiritual Alternatives to the Temple
The sectarian documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls speak of the community itself as a spiritual Temple "...Two different views on Temple and sacrifice become apparent in the Qumran writings and the Pseudepigrapha: (1) A real Temple with animal sacrifices and blood atonement. This view emerges in the War Scroll, the Temple Scroll, the book of Jubilees and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs. (2) A living temple with a spiritual worship, reflected in Qumran texts such as 1QS (together with [Rule of the Congregation] 1QSa and [Collection of Blessings] 1QSb), [Thanksgiving Psalms] 1QH, [Damascus Document] CD, and 4QFlorilegium "priestly Messiah- Otto Betz, "Jesus and the Temple Scroll" in Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls (James H. Charlesworth, Ed. - 1992), p. 96
"The Qumran Essenes [Yahad] in the middle of the second century B.C.E. developed the concept of 'the Holy Spirit' to substantiate their claims against the Temple priests and their choice to live in the desert. They claimed that 'the Holy Spirit' had left the polluted Temple and accompanied them into the wilderness. There 'the Holy Spirit' dwelt in 'the house of holiness'. The Qumran Essenes hence called themselves 'the men of holiness' and 'the men of most holiness'. Since they perceived themselves as the true priests, and since they lived where 'the Holy Spirit' dwells, they continued in their devotion to God and to truth because 'the Holy Spirit' was with them, in 'the house,' and no longer in the Temple. 'The Holy Spirit' dwells now in their community (Yahad)."
"The sacrificial system of the Old Testament demanded a sacrifice be made to God for sins that were in essence the natural state of man, as described in Genesis. The priesthood benefitted from those sacrificial offerings to god as clearly stated in Leviticus. Thus, when Jesus forgave sins he was actually forgiving taxes and depriving the high priest of their livelihood. Viewed in this light, it is little wonder why Jesus was at odds with the Hebrew high priests of the sacrificial system and why in fact those priests finally had Jesus put to death." Ironically for succeeding generations of Christians, Jesus' death on the cross as the paschal lamb was the final and culminating blood sacrifice. As for the Judeans, they were no longer able to offer sacrifices to Yahweh after the destruction of their temple in 70 C.E. Semitic tradition fell prey to the relentless and pervasive spread of Hellenism throughout the Middle East. Many kept their faith alive, however, by seeing God's house in a spiritual context.
Expulsion of the Vendors and Money Traders
"The priests decreed that payment should be made in coins of the purest silver. Only one sort was acceptable, the silver coins of the city of Tyre." The money traders installed in the Temple allowed visitors to exchange their currency for the silver shekels.
"...The prophet Zechariah...after describing the festival of Tabernacles in his fourteenth chapter, closed his prophetic work by stating that when the Lord returned to inaugurate the kingdom of God and to reclaim his Temple:"
Mahlon Smith argues against this passage as the inspiration for Jesus' attack on the temple vendors. "As reasonable as that seems in translation, it ignores the fact that Zechariah does not refer to merchants in general but to Canaanites (KaNA'ANI) in particular. While it may be true that Canaanites had the reputation of being the master merchants of the ancient Mediterranean (a mantle later inherited by European Jews), it does not follow that all Canaanites were regarded as merchants or all merchants were regarded as Canaanites. Nor is there any evidence (that I'm aware of) that ancient Jews interpreted Zech 14:21 as referring to a temple free from merchants or other economic activity."
"Many of the traders charged very high prices, taking cruel advantage of the pilgrims who came from the countryside and from foreign lands. The traders had to pay for permission to have their stalls in this area, and to seems they had to pay the leading priests." In Malachi (c. 400 B.C.E.), God rebukes a corrupt Temple priesthood one hundred years after the Exile. Only when their thievery is stopped will God's basileia [kingdom] be restored.
Mahlon Smith concludes that Jesus' visit to the Temple was most likely circumstantial. He came only because he was accompanying his Judean friends from Bethany on their annual celebration of Passover. (Jesus, being raised in Galilean traditions, did not follow this custom.) As a consequence, Jesus did not have a pre-conceived plan to attack the vendors.
"When he found the porch of the temple used as a stable for animal merchants and money changers, he was incensed since in his theology God required neither animal sacrifices nor money. With righteous rage he disrupted the commercial activities that he thought had no place in the worship of God."
Doves were sold to the poor who could not afford to purchase a larger animal for sacrifice.
"The double and triple Hulda Gates, in the southern wall of the Temple, have been discovered, as well as portions of the massive stone stairway, plazas, and walks. The money changers could have been just inside these massive gates, and a passageway from this area, indeed from the Double Gates, to the so-called Solomonic Stables has now apparently been discovered.....It is now clear that large animals could easily have been led from these stalls (which still reveal niches in which large animals were tethered) to the halls of money changers. It should be noted that the marketplace was located in the outer court which surrounded the Temple, the Court of the Gentiles, so called because non-Jews were permitted in this area. No selling took place in the two inner courts excluded to Gentiles which Josephus calls hagia or holy places.
An Implausible Event?
"...There is wide disagreement on the historicity of the specific details. The story, says Paula Fredriksen, professor of ancient Christianity at Boston University, 'is excellent theology. It's just terrible history.' Selling of sacrificial animals in the Temple court, she notes, was a long-standing practice that enabled pilgrims to meet their religious obligations. And portraying Jesus as chasing the money-changers from the Temple, says Funk of the Westar Institute, 'is not a realistic picture. There must have been hundreds of them, especially on a festival day.'"
"Three times a year large numbers of Jewish pilgrims traveled there from all over the world. Any serious threat to the temple would have been opposed vigorously both by the temple authorities and by the local inhabitants of Jerusalem." This is expecially true when the economic importance of the Temple is considered.
"A carefully calculated estimate puts the amount taken to the Temple each year at half a million shekels." The Tyrean shekel was worth four denarii so the annual income of the Temple would be equivalent to wages for two million man-days of work (5480 man-years) of work.
"That action is not, of course, a physical destruction of the Temple, but it is a deliberate symbolical attack. It destroys the Temple by stopping its fiscal, sacrificial, and liturgical operations."
Cursing the Fig Tree
(In the Gospel of Matthew, the reference to Jesus' petulance is removed and the fig tree withers away "at once".)
"...Mark himself knows that Jesus was not just purifying but symbolically destroying the Temple because he carefully framed his action with the fruitless fig tree's cursing in 11:12-14 and withering in 11:20. As the useless fig tree was destroyed, so, symbolically, was the useless Temple."
"...In Mark's redactional vision this central pericope of vv 15-19 is not a 'cleansing' of the temple in the sense of a demand for reform and purification. Rather, at least in Mark's theology, it functions as a prophecy in action, symbolizing the rejection and destruction of the temple, which Jesus will directly announce when he leaves the temple for the last time in 13:2:" The Stone the Builders Rejected
"As the Epistle to the Hebrews suggests, the Christian vision of the heavenly Jerusalem and city of God, being the goal of Christian pilgrimage and the final refuge and resting-place, is a development of Isaiah 28:16 (cf. Heb 11:10; 12:22; 13:14) and also the attitude of hope and faith directed toward it. "
In the Heir of the Vineyard parable (Mark 12:1-8 [Matthew 21:33-39; Luke 20.9-15a]), the owner of a vineyard sends a succession of servants to collect the rent from the tenent farmers, but all the servants are beaten. He then sends his beloved son, whom the farmer is certain will be respected, but the son was killed. This parable was a rather transparent allegory for the passion of Jesus and was immediately followed by the "rejected stone theme".
"The 'rejected stone theme' (lithos) appended to the Heir of the Vineyard parable, is then epitomized in Jesus' prediction that 'not one stone (lithos)' of the Temple would be left standing."
Predicting the Destruction of the Temple
(In the passage from Daniel, the "Anointed One" likely refers to the High Priest Jason who was killed by the Syrian king Antiochus Epiphanes in 168 B.C.E.)
In Mark this statement is "a false accusation coupling the Temple's actual destruction and Jesus' parousiac return."
"...Jesus could have predicted the destruction of the temple and its replacement by another 'not' made with hands'....The saying in Thomas, unfortunately, is fragmentary. Since we do not know how the saying in Thomas 71 ended" it cannot be ascribed with any certainty to Jesus.
A Symbolic Destruction?
"...An action and equal saying involving the Temple's symbolic destruction goes back to the historical Jesus himself but any biblical references or applications to the Temple's actual destruction, the resurrection, or the parousia are later explanations of an action considered enigmatic to begin with and rendered even more so by the Temple's actual destruction in 70 C.E.."
"One of the fourth evangelist's narrative techniques is to have Jesus' discussion partners misunderstand something he says. In this case, they take the remark to refer to the temple building (correctly, it seems, according to the Markan version) and so they unwittingly observe that it took forty-six years to build the present temple. The author then explains how it is possible that the 'temple' can be restored in three short days.
For the author(s) of John, Jesus' words are "not a prophecy, whether true or false, but a challenge. It is not something that Jesus will do the their Temple but something that they will do to his body."
The Final Provocations
"His Judean friends immediately interpreted this [the temple incident] as a sign that Jesus was a prophet of the stature of John the Baptist: a new Elijah come to purge the temple with fire."
"Spreading rumors of a John the Baptist or Elijah redivivus led temple police and probably Roman soldiers to scour the city to prevent some further demonstration by Jesus during Passover that might be interpreted by the crowd as an act of liberation."
"On balance, it would appear that Caiaphas [the high priest] did engineer the installation of vendors in the temple, that Jesus reacted with force, and that the collision of the two was finally adjudicated by Pilate, Caiaphas' protector."
"A disturbance in the temple would explain why temple authorities would want to detain Jesus and perhaps keep him in custody until after the festival to prevent him inciting the crowds to riot. But it is far from adequate historical cause for the gospel accounts of Jesus' arrest and execution. Where do we find that overturning money-changers' tables was a capital offense in Jewish jurisprudence? While the Roman military was swift to eliminate demagogues and their fanatic followers before they acted, where is there evidence of them singling out a single challenger of temple protocol for arrest and execution?"
"...Mat 21.14fff. represents the attack [on the temple vendors] as followed by miraculous cures in the temple, whereupon Jesus is hailed as 'the son of David' (the Messiah) and the high priests object to the title, not the attack."
"Just as the Passover lamb was examined for four days prior to Passover, so Jesus entered the Temple and was examined for four days prior to Passover by the Sadducees and the Pharisees."
"The 'imploding' reasons that moved Caiaphas [the high priest] to action no doubt included: Jesus' proclamation that the definitive kingdom of God was soon to come and would put an end to the present state of affairs in the world in general and Israel in particular, when Israel would be restored to its glory and reconstituted as the twelve tribes in the end time; his claim to teach authoritatively the will of God for people's lives, even when this seemed in individual instances to run counter to provision in the Law of Moses; his ability to attract a large following, and perhaps his decision to form a stable inner circle of 12 disciples, representing the 12 patriarchs and the 12 tribes of a restored Israel; his practice of a special rite of baptism to admit persons into his group of disciples; and his freewheeling personal conduct that expressed itself in table fellowship with toll collectors and sinners."
"...All sayings about the eschatological figure, called the son of Adam [Man]" are "the creation of the Christian community...Matthew's reference to the son of Adam as ultimate judge...[is] an expression of his theological views."
"If one adds to this volatile mix the likelihood that at least some of Jesus' followers believed him to be descended from King David and that they therefore took him to be the Davidic Messiah expected by some pious Jews, and if one allows further that Jesus had at times spoken at least in veiled fashion of his own future role in the eschatological drama, perhaps even using special titles or self-designations, the mix becomes positively explosive."
"...If one brackets out the apocalyptic sayings (which can mostly be traced to the influence of Mark who was preoccupied with signs of the endtime in Judea), then there are several subtle parallels between the message of Jesus and the clarion call for political/social liberation and prosperity by Judas of Gamala who was THE leading Galilean demagogue (by Josephus' estimate) of Jesus' youth (by either Matt or Luke's reckoning).
(2) The Raising of Lazarus According to John, although an order for Jesus' arrest was made at Tabernacles following his triumphal entry into Jerusalem, he returned nonetheless to teach in the Temple. It was the second order, one which followed the raising of Lazarus, that caused the Sanhedrin to take action. The story, as told in John, begins when Jesus informs his disciples that Lazarus had fallen asleep. Together they are to travel to Judea where Jesus will awaken him. This, despite the fact that on his previous trip, Judeans had attempted to stone Jesus to death.
Thomas' remark is peculiar, unless Lazarus' death was actually a ritualistic enactment of death and rebirth. To the Jews, Sheol was the land of the sleeping, the shades of the dead.
"When Jesus reaches Bethany [3 km from Jerusalem], one of the sisters of Lazarus, Martha, runs to meet him. Jesus tells the grieving woman that her brother will rise again. Martha replies, 'I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day'. This enable Jesus to make the staggering assertion, 'I am Resurrection and Life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?' Martha is not quite sure, and contents herself with affirming that she believes that he is the expected Messiah."
"Obviously, in biblical times the practice of medicine was not nearly as sophisticated as it is today. Even as recent as the Victorian era, to ensure that no one suffering from catatonia would be buried alive, people were buried in special types of coffins that had tubes running to the surface with bells on top. "Larue says that a person in a catatonic state shows few signs of a heartbeat or breathing. The biblical account leads him to suspect Lazarus was actually in a coma, since in this condition hearing is often the last sense lost. 'Assuming Jesus had a loud voice, and he called out "Lazarus," the man may have heard him and come out of the coma,' Larue says." - Mike Fillon, "Science Solves the Ancient Myteries of the Bible", Popular Mechanics, Dec. 1996
"According to John's Gospel, which alone [of the canonical gospels] records this miracle, the raising of Lazarus became known to multitudes at Jerusalem, as well as to the chief priests, who therefore wanted to kill Lazarus and Jesus (12:9-11)."
(3) The Egyptian Connection
"I think John's Lazarus existed first, not in history, but in Luke's parable of Lazarus and Dives. Both stories...turn on the phrase 'if they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead' (Luke 16:31). That which was a warning in Luke's parable became the reality on which the Fourth Gospel turned in John's episode of the raising of Lazarus. Indeed this raising not only failed to convince the authorities of Jesus' relationship with God, but it became the very reason the authorities sought to kill Jesus."
Luke's parable of Lazarus and Dives echoes an earlier Egyptian tale involving torment for the rich and comfort for the poor.
"In the so-called Setna Story [II Setna, II, 9ff - Memphis], written in demotic, the hero of the tale looks into the realm of the dead and there see (or learns) how, in accordance with a divine judgment, the pompous furnishings of a rich but unjust man's tomb are assigned to a poor but just man, who is buried in simple fashion; the latter achieves happiness next to Osiris, while the rich man suffers the torments of hell." Lazarus, "whom God helps" is a form of the Hebrew name Eleazar. The name metemologically corresponds to the Egyptian Ele-asar-u, the "Mummy's Constellation". This constellation was linked to Osiris, the ascended Pharoah's as 4 gospel's account of lazarus' resurrection An expurgated passage in Mark, which originated in Alexandria, Egypt two generations before the Gospel of John, describes Jesus raising a young man. With its mystic overtones, this account evidently describes an early Christian initiation and baptism ritual. Was this ritual inspired by another event that occurred in Egypt?
"Apollonius of Tyana, a miracle worker and contemporary of Christ, is said to have undergone 'ritual initiation' in the Great Pyramid whereby he was 'crucified,' buried and rose again on the third day." The earliest surviving account of this event was written by Philostratus in the early 3rd century. There are also clear parallels between Lazarus and Jesus. Both were buried in a tomb sealed with a stone while a woman Mary wept outside, and both were raised from the dead after a few days.
(4) Judas' Betrayal
"After the first order for arrest at Tabernacles, Jesus still returns to teach in the Temple; the second order, which follows the raising of Lazarus, has more impact. Jesus walks 'no more openly among the Jews'; as a wanted man, he withdraws to the wilderness: the authorities wonder whether he will dare to come to Jerusalem for the Passover, but when he does, they are not brave enough to arrest him, because he now commands such a following."
"Christians need to recognize first that the name 'Judas' was simply the Greek way of spelling 'Judah', and that Judah was the name of the patriarch who was thought to be the father of the Jewish nation. From the tenth century before the birth of Jesus on, this nation was known first as Judah and later as Judea. The designation 'Jew', therefore meant originally a member of the nation of Judah. Jewish people in Hitler's Germany were force to wear the identifying badge with the letters JUDE written on it. In the midrashic tradition...the traitor was given the name of the nation that, by the time the Gospels were being composed, was perceived to be the enemy of the Christian movement..."
"That is all the Christian Church had in writing about the betrayal until the seventh decade." The story of Judas' betrayal of Jesus is filled with allusions to Old Testament scriptures.
"Zechariah, in chapter eleven, describes the worthless shepherd who will sell his flock to the slaughterers rather than succor them. He will 'have no pity' for his flock, but will rather be more interested to say 'I am rich' (Zech. 11:5). Just as Jesus says at the Last Supper, 'Alas for that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed' (Mark 14:4), so Zechariah says, 'Alas for the worthless shepherd' (Zech. II: 17), for he says to his flock, 'I will not fatten you any more. Any that are to die, let them die.' He then breaks his shepherd's staffs and abandons his office. But 'the dealers who were watching me knew that all this was the word of the LORD.' The worthless shepherd then says to the dealers: 'If it suits you, give me my wages, otherwise keep them. '"
"The notion that a demon can be sent into food so as to enter anyone who eats the food is common, particularly in love charms:" "Even Jesus' concluding command, 'What you will do, do quickly,' echoes a common conclusion of spells, 'Now, now! Quick, quick!'". - Morton Smith, Jesus the Magician: Charlatan or Son of God? (1978) p. 146
The curse pronounced on the betrayer in the synoptics "is reproduced in two later treatises belonging to the collection of ancient documents known as the Apostolic Fathers. Its appearance in these multiple, independent sources indicates the saying once circulated independently. However, the saying is a proverb that would fit any number of occasions."
"...The Jewish word for betrayal literally means 'to hand over,' especially to hand over to a recognized enemy. In the Jewish tradition, there was one other major story in which a gigantic Jewish hero was betrayed or handed over to an enemy. That was the story of Joseph in the Book of Genesis (37-50). In that story the 'handing over' was done by a group of twelve who later became known as the leaders of the twelve tribes of Israel. In the Jesus story, the 'handing over' also came out of a group of twelve who were designated the leaders of the Church that came to call itself the new Israel. In both stories the handing over or betrayal was into the hands of gentiles, and death was the presumed result of each act of treachery. In both stories God intervened to reverse that presumed outcome. In both stories the hero was imprisoned for a time - Joseph in the pharaoh's jail, Jesus in Joseph's tomb. In both stories money was given to the traitors - twenty pieces of silver for Joseph, thirty pieces of silver for Jesus. Not lost in this analysis was the fact that the one of the twelve brothers of Joseph who urged the others to seek money for their act of betrayal was named Judah or Judas (Gen. 37:26-27)." According to Luke, Jesus later spoke the following words at the Last Supper, presumably with Judas still present:
"In this saying the author appears to reflect a tradition that knew no definition and no act of treachery. That is, this text reflects a time before the Judas legend arose. The story told in the Book of Acts (1:15-16) of one being chosen to take the place of Judas was a much later tradition, not written until the last years of the ninth decade at the earliest and probably as late as the tenth decade, as was clearly designed to address this apparent weakness." Paul also appears to have no knowledge of the Judas tradition. Referring to the disciples who later witnessed the resurrected Jesus, Paul calls them the "Twelve" (1 Corinthians 15: 6) while the other Gospels mention only the "eleven". In the Gospel of John, Judas meets with the priests after the last supper, not before as in the synoptic gospels. During the meal Satan is said to have entered into him and Judas becomes the necessary instrument for the unfolding of God's plan.
| |||||||||||||||||