![]() The Savior El Greco (c. 1610-14)
Surprising WorksAn Inspired Prophet?
"The Hebrew word navi, the most common biblical designation for a prophet, has its roots in the northern kingdom, or Israel. The word may have originally described prophets who had ecstatic trances, but came to mean prophets who appealed to the people in God's name or on whom God called."
"Those stories about Elijah and Elisha as prophetic magicians find no continuing tradition within the Hebrew Bible itself. The reason is obvious: the Temple, with its priesthood, was the place where sins were forgiven, rains were guaranteed, and healings were possible. But, at least by the centuries immediately before and after the common era, there is evidence that miraculous making of rain and miraculous healing of body were still a live tradition."
"Roeh and hozeh, Hebrew words meaning seer or visionary, apparently denoted professional prophets, who promised, for a fee, to summon a vision in which clients' questions would be answered by God. Many of them were disciples of Elijah and Elisha and were known as the sons of the prophets."
"In 65 B.C.E., with the Hasmonean dynasty stumbling toward its own destruction by rival claimants, Hyrcanus II, one of the two sons of Alexander Jannaeus, had besieged the other son, Aristobulus II, in the Temple." (Click here for details of the bloody conflict between the two brothers.) During this time, a miracle worker called Honi the Circle Drawer, or Onias as he was called by Josephus, gained renown for his ability to bring rain.
"...Links with the Elijah-Elisha tradition appear among those later wonder workers: Honi brings rain using a circle, as Elisha did in two separate miracles on Mound Caramel, the rain in 1 Kings 18:41-45 and the circular trench around the altar in 18:30-38; Hanina prays with his head between his knees in Babylonian Talmud, Berakoth 34b, just as Elijah did in 1 Kings 18:42; and he controls the rain in Babylonian Talmud, Taanith 24b=Yoma 53b, just as Elijah and the Honi family had done."
"...Jewish holy men (hasidim) from Galilee, like Honi the Circle-Drawer and Hanina ben-Dosa, have miracles attributed to them in the rabbinic literature. Thus, they might supply intriguing parallels to the traditions of Jesus as a Galilean holy man and miracle-worker....The problem is that such holy miracle-workers are only fleetingly mentioned in the Mishna, the earliest rabbinic corpus, which was written some 200 years after Honi lived. No indication that these holy men came from Galilee exists in the earliest stages of the traditions. The traditions then develop further into the Talmuds (5th-6th centuries), but the historical value of these later traditions is extremely doubtful.
(2) Jesus and the Prophetic Tradition
Cessation of Prophesy
"Such a tradition was prohibited from developing because of the power of the rabbinic claim that scripture was written under the power of the Holy Spirit and that the Holy Spirit left Israel with the latter prophets. Hence, the theology that explained the closing of the canon also prohibited the claim that Hillel, the greatest of the rabbis, received the Holy Spirit."
"The rabbinic claim that prophecy ceased (in this case with the beginning of the rule of Alexander the Great) is affirmed with the words that up until that time the 'prophets prophesied through the medium of the Holy Spirit...'(Seder 'Olam Rabba, vi, ed. Ratner, P. 140). See Urbach, Sages, vol. 1, pp. 565, 943."
"Jesus and the Essenes [Yahad] - unlike other Jews - affirmed the continuation of prophecy. Both Jesus probably and the Righteous Teacher possibly thought of themselves as prophets; both certainly saw themselves as the true heirs of the prophetic tradition. According to Luke 4 Jesus claimed that Isaiah's prophecy was being fulfilled in him; the Spirit of the Lord had anointed him to preach and act. According to the Habakkuk Pesher, God made known to the Righteous Teacher alone the exact meaning of the prophets ([Habakkuk Pesher] lQpHab 7.4-5); this passage may indicate that after the death of the Righteous Teacher the Qumranites portrayed him as 'a prophet' ",
Jesus the "Teacher"
Unlike Elijah and Elisha Jesus "made no claim - in fact, he reportedly refused to claim - that he was a prophet sent by 'the Lord' (Yahweh), or that what he said was 'the word of the Lord.'"
"...In the first century 'prophets' and 'teachers' were much more closely related. Qumran's Teacher of Righteousness did not claim to be a prophet, but he appears to have been regarded himself as such, as did his followers. A Qumran scroll refers to David as a wise man and a scribe who was inspired by God and who taught prophetically (11QPs a)."
Teaching with Prophetic Authority
"...A prophet is a messenger of Yahweh sent to declare to king or people 'the word of Yahweh.' Not so Jesus. In the synoptics he does not represent himself as a messenger, he never claims to declare 'the word of Yahweh,' and he is distinguished from the Old Testament prophets by many other traits."
"The Old Testament prophets frequently introduce their proclamation with 'Thus says the Lord'. Although this formula is not found in the gospels, 'I say to you' is very common on the lips of Jesus and has been seen by some writers as a parallel expression. However, it is now clear that at the time of Jesus 'I say to you' was used in a wide variety of contexts. Although Jesus certainly used the formula as an expression of his authority, it is not necessarily an indication of his prophetic consciousness.
"The complex Matthew 5:17-19 reflects a controversy in the early Christian community over whether the Law was still binding on Christians. Matthew's position is that the most trivial regulation, metaphorically represented by an iota (the smallest letter of the Greek alphabet) and by the serif (the tiny strokes added to the ends of letters) must be observed. Matthew thereby nullifies Jesus' relaxed attitude towards the Law, the centrality of the love commandment in Jesus' teaching, and Jesus' repeated distinction between the qualitative fulfillment of God's will and the formal observance of the Law, especially the ritual Law."
"That ringing affirmation of the permanent validity of the law of Moses as given to the people of Israel on Mount Sinai is followed by a series of specific quotations from the law. Each of these quotations is introduced with the formula 'You have heard that it was said to the men of old', and each quotation is then followed by a commentary opening with the magisterial formula 'But I say to you'. The sense of the commentary is an intensification of the commandment, to include not only its outward observance but the inward spirit and motivation of the heart. All these commentaries are an elaboration of the warning that the righteousness of the followers of Jesus must exceed that of those who followed other doctors of the law."
"Acceptance or rejection of Jesus is equated with acceptance or rejection of God. Jesus implies that he bears prophetic authority, but he does not appeal to particular titles. Jesus speaks about God only indirectly as the 'one by whom he has been sent, but the implicit claim which lies behind this saying is bold, to say the least."
A Prophet Magician
Jesus as an inspired prophet reflects the tradition that he was raised in, that of Galilean holy men who served directly as intermediaries between men and God. Jesus and his predecessors thus obviated the need for a Temple and priesthood as was practiced in Jerusalem.
The prophets Elijah and Elisha "both bypassed those in need in Israel in favor of non-Jews. Here Luke anticipates one of the major theses of his two volumes: as a result of Israel's rejection of Jesus, God's word is taken to the Gentiles." Morton Smith disagrees and argues that Jesus was more a magician (or miracle man) than a traditional prophet.
"Jesus' fundamental activities - exorcism and cures - are either unknown (exorcisms) or rare (cures) in the stories of the prophets. His getting the spirit had magical, not prophetic, analogs and consequences; so did his dealing with spirits and sayings about them, so did the majority of the miscellaneous miracles with which he was credited. He initiated his disciples and bound them to himself by magical rites unknown to the prophets, and his notions of their union with him and of his own divine nature are not prophetic but magical. Finally, the practice of telling stories about him so as to show his superiority to Moses and the other prophets explain why many stories have been told so as to parallel and contrast with Old Testament episodes."
This lack of boundaries between prophet and magician/miracle man persisted into the Talmudic era (2nd to 5th c. C.E.)
"...A penetrating look into the acts of the sages of the Mishna and Talmud in this field reveals more than a little about the type of leadership in ancient times: a leadership that included charismatic authoritative (knowledge of Halacha) Shamanistic (miraculous deeds) and political components. It is thus recognized that in ancient times there was no distinction between religion and magic (as understood by modern man) and key people in the history of Mishna and Talmud dealt with Torah as well as miraculous deeds." In all cases power resided in the authority with which one spoke.
"In contrast to the leadership of the people of Israel in the period of the Judges, a time when a charismatic leader led his people on the field of battle, the power of the charismatic leader in the Talmudic period was in his speech. The leader influenced God, spirits, humans, even foreign rulers (in any case his admirers thought so) by means of speech and dramatic talent. The religious leader was not necessarily a leader crowned by the establishment but an ascetic personality (by virtue of poverty) with ties to the other world; from a certain perspective he can be seen as a mystic (though he himself would deny it, just as he would deny that he is a prophet). The charismatic leader in the Talmudic period labored for the community without asking for anything for himself; the onlooker would see no small similarity between his personality and that of the prophet in the period of the Scriptures."
There are reports of cures and exorcisms, as well as more traditional miracles, by a charismatic leaders in rabbinic tradition. (Shamanistic practices were reported well into the Talmudic era. Click here for details.)
"It is told of Rabbi Hanina that he cured the sick with his prayer, including among others the son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakai; he lived for a week on a measure of carobs and a heavenly voice announced this and also that the world is sustained because of his merit; angels appeared to him in the form of humans; he denied that he was a prophet; as a consequence of his prayer the rain stopped and after a second prayer it began raining again; a miracle occurred to his wife and her oven filled with bread; a snake that bit him died; a miracle happened to him and vinegar burned as if it were oil; and so did various other miracles happened to him. It is indeed clear that his piety and righteousness exceeded his learning and his principal power was in being a miracle man recognized by all for his supernatural power, that is, divine."
The Miracle WorkerAn Eschatological Drama
The gospels differentiate between sickness and demon-possession (Mark 1:32) but the two share the same root cause.
"Jesus and the Essenes [Yahad] thought that the cosmos was full of demons and angels."
"Above the earth were heavens inhabited by demons, angels, and gods of various sorts (the 'many gods' whose existence Paul conceded in I Cor. 85, and among whom he counted 'the god of this age,' II Cor. 4.4). In the highest heaven was enthroned the supreme god, Yahweh, 'God' par excellence, who long ago created the whole structure and was about to remodel, or destroy and replace it. Beneath the earth was an underworld, to which most of the dead descended. There, too, were demons. Through underworld, earth, and heavens was a constant coming and going of supernatural beings who interfered in many ways with human affairs. Sickness, especially insanity, plagues, famines, earthquakes, wars, and disasters of all sorts were commonly thought to be the work of demons. With these demons, as with evil men, particularly foreign oppressors, the peasants of Palestine lived in perpetual hostility and sporadic conflict..."
"...It was typical of Jewish popular religion, in Galilee particularly, at attribute disorders to 'unclean spirits'."
"...The demons are subject to a 'ruler of the demons' or 'of this world.' Moreover, the demons are divided into classes and are characterized as causes of diseases, disabilities, etc. some of them are said to have these afflictions themselves - deafness and loss of speech, for instance, are caused by deaf and dumb demons. The basic notion that demons are the causes of insanity, disabilities, and diseases, or are themselves the diseases, is unquestioned, and is the chief reason for interest in demons. Similarly angels are of less concern as attendants of the highest god and agents in his cosmic administration that as helpers who can be called on to fight the demons."
"Great teachers of the law were celebrated as having control over supernatural powers such as demons. The charismatic rabbi Hanina ben Dosa gave orders to Agrat bat Machlat, the princess of demons (b.Pes 112b/113a)."
"...In Jesus' eyes his exorcisms are not individual acts of kindness, or even individual acts of power. They are part of the eschatological drama that is already underway and that God is about to bring to its conclusion."
"When Jesus says...that experiencing his exorcisms is experiencing the kingdom already come, he is in effect making a startling identification: one of his powerful deeds is equated with the powerful action of God assuming his rightful control of Israel in the end time, an action that has already begun and will soon be completed."
"If, as seems likely, Mark considers that Jesus has overcome Satan in the Temptation, then the Prologue ends on a triumphant note. On this view...the exorcisms are the 'mopping-up operations' of isolated units of Satan's hosts; they are certain to be successful because Satan himself has already been bound and immobilized."
"Now at last Isaiah's prophesies of Israel's healing in the end time were being fulfilled (Matthew 11:5 par.): ''The blind see, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised' - all as part of Jesus' larger program of proclaiming the good news of salvation to Israel's poor. In particular Jesus saw his exorcisms as a striking sign that even now, in the lives of individual Israelites, Satan's hold over God's people was being broken."
"The emphasis on the fulfillment of prophetic expectations is more characteristic of Christian writings than of the genuine sayings of Jesus."
"All Four Gospels as well as Josephus speak of the large following that Jesus attracted, and all Four Gospels agree with Josephus in identifying the powerful combination of miracles and teaching as the cause of the attraction." After a man had been cured of leprosy, Jesus' reputation quickly spread beyond Capernaum.
As Jesus' reputation grew, he devised a strategy for to escape the crush of the crowds.
"Jesus is seen avoiding contact with the people who wanted to be healed. As a result, he was besieged in houses and some went to great pain (such as destroying part of the roof) in order to get in. Later on, these desperate people did not wait to be touched by Jesus (he was reluctant to do it); instead, they would try to touch him, showing little respect in the process."
"Some see miracles as an implausible suspension of the laws of the physical universe. As signs, though, they serve just the opposite function. Death, decay, entropy, and destruction are the true suspensions of God's laws; miracles are the early glimpses of restoration. In the words of Jürgen Moltmann, 'Jesus' healings are not supernatural miracles in a natural world. They are the only truly 'natural' things in a world that is unnatural, demonized and wounded.'"
"But many who witnessed Jesus's miraculous feats, he said, drew the opposite conclusion: 'They said it was a display of magic art, for they even dared to say he was a magician and deceiver of the people.' To label someone a magician and a deceiver in antiquity, explains Graham N. Stanton, professor of New Testament Studies at King's College, University of London, England, 'was an attempt to marginalize a person who was perceived to be a threat to the dominant social order.'"
(Of course, in the gospels Jesus did not promise to harm enemies nor did he take any money for his healings.)
"Given that Jesus possessed unusual gifts as a healer, why did he perform the particular miracle recorded in the gospels? It was very easy to 'write off' miracle workers in first century Palestine. Exorcism could be readily explained as the result of possession by the prince of demons (Mark 3:22). The miracles of a prophet could be dismissed as those of a false prophet (cf. Mark 13:22; Act 13:6). So why did Jesus run the risk of ridicule and rejection?"
Faith Before Miracle or Miracle Before Faith
Yet, for the author of the Gospel of John, Jesus' deeds are symbolized by signs. The source of the signs in John is believed to have been independent of the Synoptic gospels. This hypothetical source has come to be known as the Signs Gospel.
"The understanding of 'signs' in the Fourth Gospel, indeed the word itself, stems from the Septuagint: Moses 'wrought the signs [semeia] before the people. And the people believed' (Ex. 4:30-31 LXX). Moses' signs were transformations-a staff into a serpent and back again, his clean hand to leprous and back again, water into blood - all meant to engender belief."
(2) Healing the Sick
Sickness vs Demonic Possession
"Luke understood this as an exorcism and made it more vivid."
"The magical tradition has preserved an appropriate rebuke: 'Plague and fever flee from the wearer of this amulet.' That fevers are caused by demons is often supposed in the magical papyri; the notion that diseases actually are demons appears already in Sophocles. It is found again in Philostratus' story that Apollonius stopped the plague in Ephesus by recognizing it - a demon disguised as an old beggar - and having it stoned. [Seper ha-Razim - 'The Book of Secrets'] contains prescriptions or stories of cures for most afflictions cured by Jesus - fever, blindness, lameness, paralysis, catalepsy, hemorrhage, and wounds. In Lk. 10:19 Jesus gives his disciples the 'authority' (i.e. power, as usual) 'to walk over snakes and scorpions...and nothing will hurt you'; the postscript to Mark made the risen Jesus promise his believers immunity from snakes and poison. Spells against snakes, scorpions, and poison are frequent in the magical material and there were rites and amulets that promised protection from everything."
"...The Aramaic is that 'he did not allow the insane to speak,' after he had healed them, 'because some of these were his acquaintances,' and he did not want them to praise him." Mark also relates that Jesus told those who witnessed the healings not to tell others (i.e., Mark 5:43, 7:36). The implied understanding was that Jesus did not want to draw too much attention to himself. While scholars have understood this as concern for his safety in the politically charged atmosphere of the times, these instructions were probably written as an apologetic response to charges that Jesus was merely a traveling magician living off the gullibility of his audience.
Creations of the Sacred Story Teller? Some biblical scholars dismiss most, if not all, of the miracles as literary creations in the tradition of the Jewish sacred story teller.
"Early Christians rummaged not only the stories of Elijah and Elisha in the Septuagint Books of Kings, but other stories as well."
"In their original context in Mark and Q they [Jesus' healings] were not set out as the fulfillment of Scripture, but they are in Matthew."
"...We find parallel and related tendencies in the literary history of the Gospel miracles: (1) The miraculous element is heightened, and any hint of limitation in Jesus' power is removed; (2) there is an ongoing 'novelizing' process, a fleshing out of the stories to make them more 'realistic,' 'detailed,' 'believable.'"
This trajectory can be traced in the development of the story of Jesus healing the deaf man as one proceeds from Mark to the later gospels.
In the next chapter, Jesus is asked to cure a blind man:
"For Matthew and Luke, who eliminated both these stories from their revisions of Mark, the notion that Jesus needed any kind of ritual (magic word) or medicinal (spittle) help, or even that he needed a little time and repetition of the treatment, was unthinkable. But having got rid of these hearings of the blind and deaf, Matthew and Luke had to supply their own accounts of such hearings, in order to satisfy the prediction of Isa. 35:5. Both went to the same non-Markan source to fill the need."
"Matthew [12:22-24] ensures his story replaces the two he removed from Mark by depicting the man as both mute and blind."
Healing by Touch
"Major types of such healings involved persons with paralyzed limbs, persons suffering from blindness (or some impairment of vision), persons suffering from various skin ailments ('leprosy'), and persons who were deaf and/or mute. Individual stories that have a good chance of going back to some event in the life of the historical Jesus - however much they may have been reworked and expanded by Christian theology - include the stories of the paralyzed man let down through the roof (Mark 2:1-12 parr.), the paralyzed man by the pool of Bethesda (John 5:1-9), the blind Bartimaeus begging near Jericho (Mark 10:46-50 parr.), the blind man of Bethsaida (Mark 8:22-26), the blind man who washed in the pool of Siloam (John 9:1-7), a deaf-mute (Mark 7:31-37), and the servant or son of a royal official (possibly a centurion) of Antipas:"
"Besides prayer magicians might - and Jesus did - resort to physical means. Most common was touching the patient, either fingering the affected area, or taking hold of the person; Jesus/the magician's hand was his most potent instrument. Fluid could help to make the contact closer; the readiest form of fluid was spittle, and both spittle and the act of spitting were commonly believed to have magical powers; so we find Jesus, like other magicians, smearing spittle on his patients or using a salve made with spittle."
(Click here for accounts in the synoptic gospels of Jesus' use of spittle in healing [above].)
"According to the gospel record, Jesus did not use any of the ingredients of traditional healing...While traditional healing did not use saliva, at least in the Bedouin culture, Jesus used it in other instances... It would appear then Jesus was more in conformity with the Graeco-Roman culture where it was believed that saliva had a healing virtue..."
In the gospel of John, Jesus used spittle mixed with mud.
"The direction by Jesus to the man born blind to wash his eyes in the pool of Silo made its way into John's pericope from the story about Elisha in the preceding chapter of Kings. There, Naaman the leper told to wash himself in the Jordan to be cleansed of his disease. Both healings have the same purpose: proof that 'there is a prophet [Esti prophetes] in Israel' (II Kings 5:8 LXX) and that Jesus 'is a prophet [prophetes estin]' (John 9:17). In both miracle stories, the one healed approaches the prophet and declares his faith, Naaman saying that he now knows 'There is no God in all the earth, save only in Israel' (5:13), while the once blind man declares, 'I believe, Lord' (John 9:38)."
While spittle may have been used in a magical context (i.e., the Emperor Vespasian's cure of the blind man), the Romans and Greeks typically used medicinal salves to effect cures.
"The healing touch. Among the most common of Jesus's recorded miracles were his healings. Yet theologians point out that every culture -- before, during and after Jesus's time -- has had stories of healings. To declare, therefore, that Jesus was a healer, and to tell stories of healings by Jesus, says Stevan Davies, New Testament scholar at College Misericordia in Pennsylvania, is 'no more exciting than to say he was a carpenter.'"
The Withered Hand
"Both stories use the same words-'withered' (exerammenzen, Mark; exrranthe, Kings), and 'stretched forth his hand' (ten cheira...exeteinen, Mark; exeteinen....ten cheira autou, Kings). Moreover, the activities of the prophet in both accounts led the authorities to desire his arrest: Jeroboam ordered his men to seize the man of God; the Pharisees and Herodians plotted together against Jesus."
Healing as the Son of David
"...The use of Son of David in this scene could be a reference to Jesus as an exorcist and healer like Solomon (David's son). It appears that in Jewish folklore in the first century Solomon was known for his miraculous powers."
" There is hardly one Solomonic tradition that does not at least implicitly refer to this figures incredible ability to cast out and control demonic beings and spirits. The Testament of Solomon (TSol) expands this tradition into an elaborate tale of how Solomon, like a shaman, actually controls the evil spirits (whilst in a trance state induced by what seems to be spirit-possession) and enlists them to assist him with the building of his temple. This is indeed evidence of a shaman-like element in the figure of Solomon which can be paralleled in Jesus' control of and use of various demons."
"Matthew actually sees Jesus as the exorcist and healer par excellence, the Son of David like Solomon (and greater than Solomon)...Almost all references to Son of David in the Gospel of Matthew occur when Jesus heals someone. There are four cases: 9:27, 12:23, 15:21, 20:29."
"Here it appears that the people a clearly linking Jesus with another Son of David with healing powers (i.e Solomon). Given that Matthew have this Jesus-Solomon link throughout his gospel I think it is very probable that Matthew himself might have made the Q-pericope about 'Someone greater than Solomon is standing here'."
"The two stories about Jesus healing people afflicted with some skin disease ('leprosy') are much more difficult to evaluate. Neither the story in Mark (1:40-45 parr.) nor the story in Luke (17:11-19), by itself, argues strongly for or against historicity. The best I can say is that, since three independent traditions (Mark, Q, and L) all speak of Jesus cleansing lepers, I incline to the view that Jesus was thought by his contemporaries to have cured lepers. But I do not feel sure enough to decide whether either story is based on a particular historical event."
"Based on both Mark [1:40-44 with parallels in Matthew 8:1-4] and the Septuagint account of the cleansing of the leprous Naaman by Elisha, the story arose in a Greek-speaking Christian environment. In the Kings version, the prophet tells Naaman to 'go' (poreutheis) wash in the Jordan and 'be cleansed' (katharistiese - IV [11] Kings 5:10 LXX), just as Jesus tells the ten lepers to 'go' (poreuthentes) to the priests, and they were cleansed (ekatharisthiesan). One of the lepers 'turned back' (hypestrepsen) after his cleansing to praise God, just as Naaman 'returned' (epestrepse) to Elisha to praise God after his cleansing ('I know there is no God in all the earth, save in Israel' - IV [II] Kings 5:15 LXX)."
At least some of Jesus' healings evidently involved one-upmanship over Jesus' Galilean predecessors:
"Elisha treated a leper by telling him to go wash seven times in the Jordan; he did, and was cured after carrying out the prescriptions. Jesus told ten lepers to go to the priests; they did, and were cured on their way. The point: Jesus cured ten times as many as Elisha, and quicker."
"What we call leprosy is caused by Mycobacterium leprae, a bacillus discovered in 1868 by the Norwegian physician Gerhard Henrik Armauer Hansen. That disease was, in fact, known in New Testament times but was then called elephas or elephantiasis. Ancient sara'at or lepra, on the other hand, covered several diseases, all of which involved a rather repulsive scaly or flaking skin condition - for example, psoriasis, eczema or any fungus infection of the skin."
"Even without believing in the supernatural...one could conclude that Jesus successfully healed certain psychosomatic illnesses -- rashes, lameness and some types of blindness, for example. Some Gospel accounts of his healings seem to involve his use of primitive medical arts -- the application of mud to the eyes of a blind man, for instance -- and his appropriation of conventional religious practices, such as Jewish purification rites for those suffering from skin diseases."
"I presume that Jesus...healed the poor man's illness by refusing to accept the disease's ritual uncleanness and social ostracization. Jesus thereby forced others either to reject him from their community or to accept the leper within it as well." Healing at a Distance
"The two versions of this story - the account derived from the Sayings Gospel Q and the report preserved by the Fourth Gospel - differ in almost every detail, yet they agree that Jesus effected a cure at a distance....The two written reports (Q and John) were derived, in the view of a majority of the Fellows, from a common oral tradition (vote: pink). The Johannine story is derived from the Signs Gospel, a collection of wondrous deeds performed by Jesus underlying the Fourth Gospel. A reconstruction of that source suggests that Jesus simply told the official that his son or lave would live and coincidentally the lad recovered....Hanina ben Dosa, a Galilean healer who lived a little after Jesus, is reported to have effected a cure very similar to the one attributed to Jesus."
"All these stories, the Synoptic, the Johannine and the rabbinical, ultimately go back to the Elijah cycle in I Kings. Note in the rabbinical narrative the disciples sent as emissary, the healer seeking privacy for his intercession, and the healing as a prophetic certification, all as in I Kings. Note in the New Testament stories the healing at a distance and the recovery in the very hour the intercession was made, just as in the rabbinical story."
Mark relates another healing of a gentile by Jesus.
These stories relate" the only two miracles that Jesus performed for Gentiles and performed at a distance. And, although this is not unique to those cases, they are performed for a child rather than the child's parent. It is hard not to consider those twin miracles, requested by a father for his son and a mother for her daughter, as programmatic defenses of the later Gentile mission, as Jesus' proleptic initiation of that process.....Early Christian communities symbolically retrojected their own activities back into the life of Jesus."
(3) Techniques of Exorcism Traditions in Palestine
"Exorcisms clearly were a part of the Jewish milieu in first-century Palestine. The Judaism of Jesus's time, observes Rousseau, had been influenced by Babylonian, Persian, Egyptian and Greek cultures. The Persian belief that demons could possess individuals and cause diseases, says [John J.] Rousseau [an archaeologist and member of the Jesus Seminar], 'had gained wide acceptance, and techniques of exorcism were used for the treatment of illnesses.'
"Often those techniques involved use of magical devices such as amulets, rings, stones and other artifacts, which have recently been discovered at archaeological sites. One tradition, mentioned by both the first-century Jewish historian Josephus and the third-century Christian writer Origen of Alexandria, held that the ancient Israelite King Solomon, who lived in the 10th century B.C., was himself an exorcist."
Describing the possessed as "in convulsion" and "foaming at the mouth", "the succinct accounts of Jesus' relation to these events, his success and failure together with that of his disciples, as well as the particulars of his cures, coincide so exactly with what we know of these states from the point of view of present-day psychology that it is impossible to avoid the impression that we are dealing with a tradition which is veracious."
"The phenomenon of split consciousness or of compulsive action against which the victim appears to be helpless appears primarily in Christian and Jewish cases of possession. In fact, in a review of the ethnographic literature on hundreds of societies, we have not encountered this phenomenon. Rather, we are more likely to find a total transformation, the apparent substitution of one personality for another."
"Jesus's method of simple command over the demons differed greatly from that practiced by other holy men of his time. Most exorcists of the period relied on ritual, chants, signs and artifacts to expel evil spirits." Amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is a description of an exorcism that is strongly reminiscent of those performed by Jesus.
"Of the seven references to individual exorcism in the Synoptics, the story of the (epileptic?) boy in Mark 9:14-29, the brief reference to Mary Magdalene's exorcism (Luke 8:2), and possibly the core of the story of the Gerasene demoniac (Mark 5:1-20) go back - sometimes through a number of layers of later Christian interpretation - to events in Jesus' ministry. That Jesus performed exorcisms is also supported by the Q tradition (Luke 11:20 par. in particular and Luke 11:14-23 par. in general)."
"Besides the several accounts of Jesus casting out demons, the Acts of the Apostles -- the New Testament book that chronicles the early growth of Christianity after the Resurrection -- notes that Jesus's disciples also performed exorcisms. Many scholars conclude that such a preponderance of reports indicates that Jesus probably did set the example for his followers. Yet as with healings, whether or not the specific exorcisms recorded in the Gospels are factual accounts of actual events remains a matter of dispute." "The statements that control of demons is less important the assurance of salvation, and that some who exorcised and did miracles in his name would not be saved in the end show attempts to belittle exorcism and subordinate magical powers to party membership and 'correct' behavior - the sort of thing we find in Paul." - Morton Smith, Jesus the Magician: Charlatan or Son of God? (1978) pp, 171-172 Rebuking the Spirits
"Christ's method differed from other approaches because it "consisted neither in magical means nor in ritualistic rigmaroles, but in His own living word of infinite power. He spoke and the demons obeyed Him as Lord of the spirit world."
"Some of the Prayers for exorcism in the magical papyri are long, elaborate compositions, but others are very brief, like the commands."
Jesus' method was similar to that of Apollonius of Tyana.
"Jesus ability to control the demons is described as his 'power' or 'authority'; both terms are also used in magical material. The 'power' was thought to be in him and to work of itself, like an electric charge, without his volition - a notion probably derived from actual cures of hysterical persons who succeeded in pushing through the crowds and touching the holy healer. Nevertheless, some of his more elaborate miracles or magical rites followed periods perhaps preparatory, and certain exorcisms are said to have presupposed prayer (and perhaps fasting), as they commonly did for other magicians.
Compare the report of Jesus' method with Lucian's parody of an exorcism:
Shamans and psychologists both use similar methods to dealt with hysteria and possession. "In each case an authority or power - a 'belief system' - is imposed on the one in which is trapped, essentially hypnosis. Jesus is consistently described in the gospels as using a sharp, authoritative manner in dealing with cases of possession and similar conditions: 'Be quiet! Come out of him!' (Mark 1:26), 'Ephphatha!' ('Be opened!') (Mark 7:34), 'Talitha kum!' ('Little girl, I tell you to get up!') (Mark 5:41), leaving little doubt that Jesus' methods were similar."
"However, talitha koum also circulated without translation as a magical formula: a partial misunderstanding of it became the basis of another phrase - if not an entire story - preserved in Acts 9.36ff. where Peter raises a dead woman conveniently named Tabitha by saying to her in Greek, 'Tabitha, get up.' (Tabitha is a mispronunciation of talitha, which the storyteller mistook for a proper name.)"
(Both Matthew 9:25 and Luke 8:54, which borrow from the story in Mark, omit the Aramaic phrase.)
Spirit Possession
From accusations that he was out of his mind, "it seems that Jesus' exorcisms were accompanied by abnormal behavior on his part. Magicians who want to make demons obey often scream their spells, gesticulate, and match the mad in fury. This connection between magic and mania recurs in other forms of the charge against Jesus: in Jn. 7.20 and 8.52 for instance, when the crowd says to him, 'You have a demon,' they mean, practically, 'You're crazy'; but compare Jn. 10.20 where they distinguish the states, 'He has a demon and is insane.' Identification of the two conditions lies behind Lk. 4.23, where Jesus is made to anticipate that his townspeople, ridiculing his claim to be a healer, will tell him, 'Doctor, cure yourself.'"
In Aramaic "an insane man is called dewana, which literally means that he is possessed of a devil, or has become wild."
Rabbinic tradition distinguishes between madness and demonic possession, however.
"The rabbis define 'a madman' as 'one who goes out by night alone and spends the night in a graveyard and tears his clothes and destroys whatever is given him' and they note that his condition my occur in transient fits; they also distinguish between such a madman and a magician who 'spends the night in a graveyard so that an unclean spirit will come upon him."
According to Mark, other people believed Jesus was possessed by the spirit of John the Baptist.
"One of the commonest forms of exorcism was to order the demon out 'by the name of' some more powerful being, usually a god whose 'true name' or 'true' title or function the magician knew. Use of this true name and designation not only enabled the magician to call effectively for the god to come and enforce his orders; it also was effective by itself, for the name both was an independent power and united the magician with the god he named. Thus it gave him, at least momentarily, both the god's power and its own. We have here another form of the notion of Jesus presupposed by the exorcism stories - the notion that he is, or is united with, a supernatural being, so that even his name is a power."
This sense of being united with a spirit is also conveyed by Paul.
"Magicians did write spells and the like on their flesh; directions for doing so are given in the magical papyri, i.e., Papyri graecae magicae VII. 222-223; VIII. 65ff. Moreover, Paul claimed to be tattooed or branded with 'the marks of Jesus,' Gal. 6.17 - most likely, the same marks that Jesus had carried."
"Ma'ase Merkava and other extracts from the Hekhalot, as well as from late Midrashic literature, show that seals [with the name of God] were actually inscribed on the body, and were not just referred to as metaphors. This clarifies the magic apotropaic aim of this practice, and the use of the seal as a 'password' into the Heavenly palaces as well as a shield on earth."
The belief that Jesus's name could heal continued long after his death in Jewish circles.
"From the middle years of the third century comes an obscure curse by a Palestinian rabbi, 'Woe on him who makes himself alive by the Name of god.' This may reflect the belief (later widespread) that Jesus did his miracles and even raised himself from the dead by magical use of the diving Name, the greatest of all spells. About the same time another rabbi advised his pupils as to biblical verses they might use for refutation, 'if the whore's son veils you there are two gods' - the second god being Jesus himself. A generation later another Palestinian, Rabbi Abbahau, said, 'If a man tells you, "I am a god," he is a liar; "I am the son of Man," he will regret it; "I go up to the heavens," he promises, but he will not perform.' Here the reference to Jesus is unmistakable; evidence that he claimed to be able to go up into the heavens is also found in the New Testament. A blessing of the late third or early fourth century concludes with the assurance that you shall have no sons or disciples who publicly disgrace themselves 'like Jesus the Nazarene'."
Exorcisms in Talmudic Literature
"In spite of the abridged nature of the story, it probably ended with Rabbi Hanina ordering the spirit to leave the poor woman, notwithstanding that previously the spirit (and its family) had done him a favor. Indeed the spirit fled and the woman was cured, revealing the power of Rabbi Hanina. It is to be noted that this story is not known from Talmudic literature itself but from the writing of a twelfth-century Ashkenazi wise sage....The fact that the Jerusalem Talmud, and also various midrashic (sermonic) texts, have not been preserved intact shows that it is definitely possible that this text is authentic and was originally written in the Talmudic period."
According to the Mishna and Talmud, Rabbi Simon was an important sage in Israel during the 2nd c. C.E.
"It is told about Rabbi Simon that beside his greatness in Torah study, spread through the entire Talmud, he was learned in miracles: he commanded a valley to fill with dinars, and so it happened; in his days the rainbow was not seen (for the world was sustained by his merit, and the mark of the covenant was not necessary); a carob tree and spring were created for him in the cave where he hid with his son; while in the cave he was nourished only by carobs, and in another connection it was said about him that his teeth blackened because of his fasts; he stared at one man and killed him (with the 'evil eye'); he raised bones of the dead from the land of Tiberias to purify it;27 and additional wonder stories were told about him."
The Talmud tells of Rabbi Simon exorcising a male spirit called Ben Tamalyon.
(The Bet-Hamidrash, from the collection of midrashim 'Beth Midrash', gives a longer version of the same story wherein the spirit is female and her name not given.)
"Abba Yossi man of Zeitur (apparently a place in Galilee) informed the residents of the city of the presence of a spirit in their water spring, a good spirit that appeared to him and informed him that an evil spirit wanted to chase him from the water. And so, this Abba Yossi succeeded at first in bringing the residents of his city to the spring, led them in their battle (his battle) against the evil spirit and finally succeeded in exorcising the evil by means of agricultural implements."
(A slightly shorter version translated into the Hebrew can be found in Tanhuma Buber. Even to this day many Jewish and Moslem residents believe that good and evil spirits inhabit the springs of Israel.)
Raising the Dead
Current Practices and Expectations
"Both Elijah and Elisha raised boys (one each) from the dead by the drastic method of lying on tip of them (Elijah three times, Elisha only twice) and praying to Yahweh (I Kings 17.21f.; II Kings 4.34f.). Jesus raised at least three persons, a girl by taking her hand, two young men by mere orders. This is clearly intended to show Jesus' superior power."
Jarius' Daughter
"The story stays close to the Old Testament original; in both, the prophet, on the way to the child, receives the message that it is dead, but continues resolutely. In both stories the prophet seeks privacy for the miracle: 'After turning all the others out, [Jesus] took the child's father and mother and his own companions and went in where the child was lying,' just as Elisha shut the door upon himself and the child. And in both, the prophet touches the child and speaks, and the child awakes. In Mark, the parents were 'ecstatic with great ecstasy' (exestesan...ekstasei megale - Mark 5:42); in Kings, the mother of the child is 'ecstatic with all this ecstasy' (exestesas ... pasan ten ekstasin tauten - IV Kings)."
"...Aramaic was the language Jesus regularly used in addressing his fellow Palestinian Jews; but only a few traces of his Aramaic words have been preserved in our Four Gospels. In fact, talitha koum ['Young girl, arise'] and ephphatha ('be opened' in the story of the deaf-mute in Mark 7:34) are the only cases of Jesus' Aramaic words of command appearing in miracle stories of the Four Gospels."
"In Mark 5, Matthew 9, and Luke 8, the president of an unnamed synagogue, one Jairus (whose name, 'He will awaken,' betrays the representative and fictional nature of the account), comes to Jesus, like the Shunnamite woman to Elisha, 'falls at his feet and entreats him many times,' saying, in both Mark and Luke, that his only daughter was dying. In Matthew, to align more closely with the story's Old Testament source - as is typical of the careful and knowledgeable first evangelist - the child is already dead. At this point all three Synoptics intercalate the story of the woman with the issue of blood. After that miracle:"
A similar feat of raising a girl was credited to Jesus' contempory, Apollonius of Tyana.
"The revival of the widow's son at Nain closely resembles the story of Elijah's resuscitation the son of the widow of Zarephath..."
"Both stories begin with a favorite Septuagintal formula, 'And it came to pass' [kai egeneto], Both concern the dead son of a widow (chera). In both the prophet 'went' (eporeuthe) to the town, where he met the woman at the 'gate of the city' (ton pylona tes poleos - LXX; te pyle te poleos - Luke), even though archaeological study has shown that the village of Nain in Galilee never had a wall; Nain's fictional gate is there for literary reasons - Sarepta's gate transferred. In both stories the prophets speak and touch the dead son, who then rises and speaks. In both stories it is declared that the miracle certifies the prophet (Behold, I know that thou art a man of God' - LXX; 'A great prophet has arisen' - Luke). And both stories conclude with precisely the same words: 'and he gave him to his mother' (kai edoken auton te metri autou).""
(2) The Raising of Lazarus
The Young Man in Secret Mark
"This is a miracle story of the synoptic type, based, like the narratives of the raising of Job's daughter and the widow of Nain's son, on the stories of Elijah's and Elisha's raising of dead sons. Just as the dead man's sister in the Secret Gospel approaches Jesus and prostrates herself before him to ask for help, so the Shunnamite woman whose son has died approaches Elisha and falls at his feet (II Kings 4:27). In the Secret Gospel, when the woman bows before Jesus, his disciples try to rebuke her for her precipitous act, just as in Kings, when the woman prostrates herself before Elisha, his disciple Giezi tries to thrust her away (II Kings 4:27). In both stories the prophet grows angry or speaks harshly to those attempting to stop the woman: Jesus being 'angered'. Elisha saying to Giezi, 'Leave her alone' (II Kings 4:28). In both, the prophet approaches the deceased, makes appropriate movements, and the dead arise. Elijah's resurrection of the widow of Sarepta's son in I Kings seems also to have influenced the story in the Secret Gospel of Mark: on the dead son's awakening, he 'cried out' (I Kings 17:22), just as the dead man in the Secret Gospel 'gave a great cry'."
Precedents in the Mystery Religions
"Smith concludes that the Secret Gospel resurrection and the story of Lazarus' resurrection both stem from some 'common source which both [Secret] Mark and John used...'"
"That some such teaching was to be understood is indicated by the longer text's report of the youth's coming at night in the costume - a linen cloth over his naked body - that was standard for participants in magical rites, especially for boys to be possessed by spirits and made to see the gods. Canonical Mark reports that another young man in the same costume was with Jesus late at night at the time of his arrest (14.51). Nothing is said of what he was doing; we may suppose that he too was being taught 'the mystery of the kingdom of God'."
"...The linen cloth worn as the sole garment...was a common costume for ancient religious, especially mystery, ceremonies; it was customary for magically induced visions, and it became the standard costume for Christian baptism, the initiatory mystery of the church."
Secret Baptismal Rites?
"...Canonical Mark is a censored version of Secret Mark, so that [the quotation above] was present in the first edition of Mark, the one that Clement calls Secret Mark. Second, it was probably used in the nude baptism practice of his community and thereby received an erotic interpretation among some believers. The second-century Carpocratians known to Clement were not, in other words, the only or even the first early Christians with homosexual understandings of such baptisms. Proto-Carpocratians existed, as it were, within the immediate time and place of Mark's first composition."
"...It now seems possible and, given the Gospel reports, even likely that Jesus taught a 'mystery of the kingdom of God' in which, by means like those known from contemporary magic, initiates were given what they thought was an experience of entering the heavens and they were thus trained to have such visions as those reworked in the transfiguration and resurrection stories."
"Jesus, unlike John, was not a baptizer but a healer. The tradition, therefore, had no baptism-by-Jesus stories that could be used in the baptismal liturgies. But a story about a miraculous or physical raising from death could be used or created as a symbol for baptismal or spiritual raising from death. In church practice, then, the convert would hear that story and experience its reenactment during baptismal preparation in the night and nude baptism in the dawn."
Morton Smith, who discovered Secret Mark, "held that the best explanation for the literary and historical evidence surrounding the miracles of Jesus was that Jesus himself actually performed--or meant to and was understood to have performed--magical feats. Among these was a baptismal initiation rite through which he was able to ' give' his disciples a vision of the heavenly spheres. This was in the form of an altered state of consciousness induced by ' the recitation of repetitive, hypnotic prayers and hymns,' a technique common in Jewish mystical texts, Qumran material, Greek magical papyri and later Christian practices such as the Byzantine liturgy."
"'After six days' is not from the historical life of Jesus but the baptismal practice at Alexandria..."
"A peculiar aspect of the Coptic tradition is that it identifies the baptismal day, the sixth day of the sixth week, with a tradition which asserted that that was the day on which Jesus baptized his disciples." Secret Mark, therefore, is more germane to early Christian practices in Alexandria than any actual incident from the life of Jesus.
Bethany, "destroyed when the Romans attacked Jerusalem in A.D. 70, was later rebuilt and was renamed by the Arabs who settled there. 'The Israelis today call it Bethanya but the Arabs call it el-Azariyeh, "the place of Lazarus",' says [Paul] Maier [professor of ancient history at Western Michigan University]. 'I find that fascinating. Why would they change the name of the town unless something spectacular happened there?" The Women
"The Lazarus story in John contains a rather strange sequence that has Martha coming from the Lazarus house to greet Jesus, whereas her sister, Mary Magdalene, remains inside until summoned by Jesus. But in contrast to this, the original Mark account said that Mary Magdalene actually came out of the house with Martha and was then chastised by the disciples and sent back indoors to await Jesus' instruction. This was a specific procedure of Judaic law, whereby a wife in ritual mourning was not allowed to emerge from the property until instructed by her husband."
"The woman in Bethany did not wipe Jesus' feet with her hair; rather she took a bottle of oil of nard, 'broke it open and poured the oil over his head' (Mark 14:3). John has misremembered his sources, confusing this story with one in Luke, set at Nain, about another unnamed woman:"
"Thus, the Mary who sat at Jesus' feet becomes the woman who anointed Jesus' feet, who was already misidentified with the woman at Bethany who anointed his head. Lazarus comes, of course, from another story in Luke, Jesus' parable of Dives and Lazarus (16:1931), neither of whom is related to Mary or Martha, or to Bethany."
Jesus' parable of Dives and Lazarus is based on an earlier Egyptian tale. Click here for details.
Parallels with the Myth of Osiris
"The chief features of the Egyptian religion remained unchanged from the Vth and VIth dynasties down to the period when the Egyptians embraced Christianity, after the preaching of St. Mark the Apostle in Alexandria, A.D. 69, so firmly had the early beliefs taken possession of the Egyptian mind; and the Christians in Egypt, or Copts as they are commonly called, seem never to have succeeded in divesting themselves of the superstitious and weird mythological conceptions which they inherited."
"In the Egyptian myth, Osiris, who dies, has two sisters, Isis and Nephthys. Osiris lies dead at Annu, the Egyptian necropolis, known in Greek as Heliopolis and in the Old Testament as Beth-shemesh (Jer. 43:13) 'City of the Sun' and 'House of the Sun,' respectively. This necropolis had a variety of formulaic names in Egypt: 'the mansion of the Prince in On,' 'the House of the Aged Prince who dwelleth in An,' the 'great house of Anu.' Just as Heliopolis was readily semitized as Beth-shemesh, the House of Anu is readily semitized as Beth-anu [Bethany]. Likewise 'Lazarus' (the Greek form of the Hebrew name 'Eleazar) readily associates itself with the name of the god Osiris (semitized as El-Osiris)."
More precisely, Eleazar, "whom God helps", etymologically corresponds to the Egyptian Ele-asar-u, the "Mummy's Constellation", which was linked to Osiris. We now know Osiris' constellation as Orion. These stars "resurrected" in the eastern sky just before sunrise during the same time of year that the floodwaters of the Nile overflowed and deposited their fertile mud.
"Nature Miracles"
"Turning the Nile into blood was the first of the great plagues caused by Moses; John emphasizes that the turning of water into wine was the first of Jesus' great miracles (2.11)."
"An examination of the account of Elijah's providing flour and oil in III Kings LXX reveals some direct verbal sources for the story of Jesus' miracle at Cana. One of the most puzzling aspects of this first miracle in the Fourth Gospel is Jesus' rudeness to his mother: 'Woman, what have I to do with you? [Ti emoi kai soi, gunai].' As has been seen before, the statement is here not a historical report but an antitype of Elijah: for the woman [gune] in need of food says to that prophet, 'What have I to do with thee? [ti emoi kai soi]' (III [I] Kings 17:18 LXX). In both stories the prophet instructs those in need of sustenance to take empty pitchers (hydria, LXX; hydriai, John) and remove from them the needed provision, which miraculously appears. This and the succeeding miracle in Kings, Elijah's resurrecting of the woman's son, lead her to place her faith in him as a prophet: 'I know that thou art a man of God' (III Kings 17:24 LXX), just as Jesus' act leads his disciples to put their faith in him."
Before the story reached its final form, it was evidently also influenced by the mythology of Dionysus
"The Johannine story of Jesus' turning water into wine (2.1-11) was modeled on a myth about Dionysus told in a Dionysiac festival celebrated at Sidon [Phoenicia]. A first- or second-century A.D. report of the festival shows striking similarities, even in wording, to the gospel material and makes its polemic purpose apparent."
"As a god associated with the vine, grapes, and wine, Dionysus naturally was believed to perform wonders in connection with wine. Ancient worshipers of Dionysos from various locales claimed that Dionysos effected miracles with wine on holy days. It was said, for instance, that a fountain of wine flowed by itself from the ground and that spring water from the temple of Liber (identified with Dionysos) has the flavor of wine of festival days. (Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, 3.66. 1-2; Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 2.106, 31:13; cp. the springs of cool water and wine that come forth when a Bacchante strikes the ground with her thyrus in Euripides Bacchae."
This miraculous sign, turning water into wine, is not mentioned in any of the synoptic gospels.
"In the synoptic gospels the 'glory' of Jesus is, as it were, glimpsed by Peter, James, and John only temporarily at the Transfiguration (Mark 9:1-8 and parallels), and even then they fail to grasp the significance of this disclosure. In John the 'glory' of Jesus is revealed openly at the very outset of his ministry at the wedding in Cana in Galilee : this is the first of the 'signs' which Jesus does and in his concluding comment the evangelist notes that its outcome was that 'his disciples believed in him' (2:11)."
"According to the ritual described in the Dead Sea Scrolls, the relevance of this is plain. At (the equivalent of) Communion, only fully initiated celibates (presided over by a priest) were allowed to partake of wine. All others present were regarded as unsanctified and were restricted to a purifying ritual with water - these included married men, novices, Gentiles, and all lay Jews. The Gospel text continues, 'There were set there six water-pots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews'. The great significance of Jesus' action is that he took it upon himself to break with tradition: he abandoned the water entirely and allowed the 'unclean' guests to take the sacred wine. The 'ruler of the feast' (in Greek, the
arcitriklinoV) who tasted the wine 'knew not whence it was (but the servants which drew the water knew)'. He did not comment on any marvelous transformation, but simply remarked that he was surprised the good wine (as against the water - poor wine) had made its appearance at that stage of the proceedings."
"Tellingly, John notes that the wine came from huge (twenty- to thirty-gallon) jugs that stood full of water at the front of the house, vessels that were used by observant Jews to fulfill the rules on ceremonial washing. Even a wedding feast had to honor the burdensome rituals of cleansing. Jesus, perhaps with twinkle in his eye, transformed those jugs, ponderous symbols of the old way, into wineskins, harbingers of the new. From purified water of the Pharisees came the choice new wine of a whole new era. The time for ritual cleansing had passed; the time for celebration had begun."
"It is strange that both Mary and Jesus, guests at a wedding in a town not their own, proceed without further ado to give orders to the servants, Jesus' orders being especially demanding and puzzling, if not outright bizarre. Likewise strange for a house in a small hill-town in Galilee would be the large number of massive stone water jars within or right outside the house. In general, one wonders about the large number of servants (for many would be needed to fulfill Jesus' command in any speedy fashion) under the direction of a headwaiter [
arcitriklinoV - the chief slave who responsible for managing a banquet]. Is this a likely scenario in a Galilean hill-town? Has perhaps a Greco-Roman urban setting familiar to the Evangelist been imported into this story?"
"We discovered that the term 'turning water into wine' was common parlance, equivalent tot he English expression 'making a silk purse out of a sow's ear'. In this context, it really referred to Jesus using baptism to turn batches of ordinary people into those fit to enter into the 'Kingdom of Heaven', in preparation for the 'end of the age'. In Qumranian terminology the uninstructed were the 'water' and the trained and refined were 'wine'."
Parallels in 2 Kings
After the execution of John the Baptist by Herod Antipas, "a large crowd 'like sheep without a shepherd', who, with scant thought for provisions, immediately journeyed to a 'lonely place' to seek out Jesus."
"The disciples, though they have presumably just witnessed Jesus feed five thousand with five loaves, naively ask, 'How can anyone provide all these people with bread in this lonely place?' - Mark 8:4."
"These stories about Jesus are modeled on the close parallel in II Kings 4.42ff. where the social setting and dialogue are also similar; the magical parallels are remote and unrelated. This is a clear case in which Old Testament material has been used for secondary expansion, to prove Jesus greater than Elisha; Elisha fed only a hundred, Jesus four or five thousand."
A Symbolic Meal "...The Fellows found it highly implausible as the report of an actual event. Mark states that the place they were in was 'desolate' (a wilderness, v.35), yet it was possible for them to go to nearby farms and villages and buy something to eat (v.36). Nowhere in the story is it claimed that Jesus wrought a miracle; there is no acclamation or expression of wonder at the end, as one expects n the standard miracle story."
"...The multiple attestation of sources and the coherence of the story with Jesus' habit of holding joyful meals fraught with eschatological significance argue for a historical basis to the feeding of the multitudes. The story seems to go back to some especially memorable and symbolic meal Jesus celebrated with a large crowd by the Sea of Galilee."
"Whatever the background truth of this story, its origins are undoubtedly early: Mark had evidently drawn on two even earlier accounts of the event, one referring to five thousand people, the other to four thousand."
The Dead Sea Scrolls and Pharisaic Connections
According to the Temple Scroll (15.9-14), "the first feast during the year to be celebrated at the sanctuary was the feast of Millu'im, a dedication of the Temple and the priesthood during the first seven days of the month of Nisan (see Ex 29; Ezek 43:18-27). On each day of the celebration a basket of bread had to be offered together with a ram as a wave offering in the Temple. This offering of seven baskets of bread, not mentioned in the Bible, must have been characteristic of the Essenes [Yahad] and referred to by Jesus in the conversation with his disciples reported in Mk 8:14-21.
Re: Jesus feeding the four thousand people in the wilderness:
The meager amount of "bread" that failed to feed the multitudes was produced by the yeast of the Pharisees and Herod. What Jesus offers is bread that takes away hunger without having to be consumed.
"The Pharisees emphasized the offering of twelve loaves of bread of the Presence each week in the Temple, loaves that were eaten by the priests, while for the Essenes [Yahad] the seven baskets of bread to be offered during the seven days of the feast of Dedication were characteristic. In the eyes of Jesus, the bread of the Pharisees and the Herodians was 'leaven,' that is, bread not suited for a sacrifice (cf. 1 Cor 5:6-7). On the other hand, the bread distributed by him at the feeding of the multitudes originated from God, pointing to the 'bread of life': it is the Son of God, sent by the Father in order to save humanity by offering eternal life (Jn 6:33-35)."
The Trajectory of Change
"...The bread and fish Eucharist was originally a postresurrectional confession of Jesus' continued presence at the ritualized meals of the believing community. Open commensality survived as ritualized meal. Once narrative Gospels were composed that tradition was placed both before the resurrection, in the common source for Mark 6 and John 6, and after the resurrection, in Luke 24 and John 21. Even more fascinating, however, are those fleeting but tantalizing glimpses we catch across the bread and fish tradition as it moves from general community toward leadership group and on to specific leaders."
"...The question comes from the disciples in Mark 6:35 but from Jesus in John 6:5; the food comes from the disciples in Mark 6:38 but from 'a lad' in John 6:9; the preparation comes from Jesus directly in Mark 6:39 but from Jesus through the disciples in John 6:10; the distribution comes from Jesus through the disciples in Mark 6:41 but from Jesus directly in John 6:11; and the collection of fragments comes from an unidentified 'they' in Mark 6:43 but from Jesus through the disciples in John 6:12....There must have been a trajectory of change from action by Jesus directly toward action by Jesus through the disciples along both branches of the transmission."
(3) Miracles on Water Stilling of the Storm
(This Psalm also served as the prototype for the story of the stilling of the storm in the Book of Jonah.)
"Matthew recognized as a partial source of the disciples' 'We perish [apollumetha]' in Mark 4:38, the speech of the sailors in Jonah 1:14 LXX: 'Forbid it, Lord. Let us not perish [medamos, Kyrie. me apolometha].' But Matthew also observed that the ship's captain says to Jonah, 'Call upon thy God, that God may save us, and we perish not [hopos diaso se ho Theos hemas, kai ou me apolometha]' - Jonah 1:6 LXX. Thus Matthew, taking key words from Jonah-'Lord,' 'save us,' 'we perish' - rewrites Mark: a fictional correction of a fictional account, each of which is based in its own way on the Old Testament."
"If it seems strange that Jesus could sleep in the stem of a small open fishing-boat in the middle of a storm so violent that waves were breaking over the vessel and filling it with water, Jesus' sleep should be seen not as a description of an event but as a literary necessity, the fulfillment of a typological foreshadowing: 'Jonah had gone down into a corner of the ship and was lying sound asleep when the captain came upon him.' That the disciples should speak rudely to Jesus is likewise accounted for in the captain's speech: 'What, sound asleep?... Get up' (Jonah 1:5-6). When Mark does not observe that the disciples were afraid during the storm, but only after the storm had been stilled, he is recounting an antitype, not an event, a literary fiction built from a supposed prefigurement: after the storm is stilled in Jonah, the men 'feared [ephobethesan] the Lord with great fear [phobo megalo]' - 1:6 LXX, just as in Mark, after the sea is calmed, the disciples 'feared very greatly [ephobethesan phobon megan]'' - 4:4 1."
The Christian Sibylline Oracles, a work which is likely independent of the canonical Gospels, includes both wind and waves in the same story and inverts the sequence of meal then sea.
Mark's Boat Source
"What have we covered with this tale of a voyage in a 'boat' which concludes in a 'ship?' E. Schmidt [Rahmen], wrote that Ps.107.1-32 was the LITURGY followed in the Temple service as votive offerings were presented at Rosh Hashana, the New Year 'time of accounting.' The four event-interpretations of Gospel of Mark's Boat Source are obviously the haggadoth [free rabbinical interpretations of Scripture] narrating the four stages of that Psalm. As a written composition the Boat Source probably began with the Tishri introduction recaptured in Mk.1:14-15 (Vs.15 [The kingdom of God is near. Repent...] echoes Rosh Hashana, the ten penitential days concluding in Yom Kippur, and the promised Kingdom which lies at the root of the Feast of Booths). Possibly the original List of the Twelve, which has gone through three stages of narration in Gospel of Mark, was part of the Boat Source as well."
Walking on Water
"Early Christians knew from Job 9:8 that the Lord 'walks on the sea [peripaton epi tes thalasses] as on dry ground'. thus they also presented Jesus 'walking upon the sea' (peripaton epi tes thalasses - Mark 6:48). But for the basis of their narrative about this 'predicted' event, they went to the Septuagint Psalms, as may best be seen by comparing Mark's and John's versions of the pericope. The latter's account begins at 6:16: 'At nightfall, his disciples went down to the sea [katebesan... epi ten thalassan] and got into their boat [ploion],' echoing the Septuagint: 'They that go down to the sea in ships [hoi katabainontes eis thalassan en ploios] ... these see the works of the Lord, his wonders in the deep' (Ps. 106 [107]:23-24 LXX). Mark 6:49-50 contains another echo of Psalm 106: When the disciples saw Jesus walking on the water they 'cried out [anekraxan],' for 'they were troubled [etarachthesan]'. in the Psalm, those who go down to the sea in ships become 'troubled (etarachthesan)' in a storm and 'cry [ekechraxan] to the Lord in their distress' (Ps. 106: 27-28 LXX). Their prayer brings deliverance, and the Lord 'guides them to their desired haven' (v. 30), just as he does in John, where 'immediately the boat was at the land to which they were going' (6:21)."
"Matthew's embellishment was probably borrowed from a Buddhist legend which appears to have made its way into the Christian oral tradition. One of the stories told by Buddhist missionaries, who were in Syria and Egypt as early as the second century B.C., similarly concerns the power of faith granted to a disciple of Buddha:"
"It is not even certain...that Jesus walked on the sea in this story. The Greek word is epi, and that is translated as 'upon the sea' in John 6:19 but 'by the sea' in John 21:1. Thus John 6:16-21, apart from its parallel version in Mark 6:45-52, can be taken to mean that they were forced along the shore by the contrary winds until they finally picked up Jesus 'three or four miles' from where they had started. The point is not to diminish the miracle but to keep the focus where it should be, not on the general power of Jesus but on the specific impotence of the disciples without him. In Mark, however, the emphasis has shifted to underline the majestic power of Jesus, hence, of course, to increase their culpable misunderstanding."
"Dennis MacDonald, a professor of New Testament and Christian origins at Iliff School of Theology in Denver, sees a connection between stories of Jesus walking on water and calming the seas and Homer's Odyssey, in which the god Poseidon is depicted as walking on water and controlling the wind and waves. The Gospel writers, says MacDonald, would have been familiar with Homer's writings, which were in common use as school texts in the ancient world. The Christian writers drew upon the familiar motif, argues MacDonald, to construct stories 'in which Jesus revealed his divine identity.'"
"In stories like the walking on the water Jesus is becoming the very epiphany of God; what the OT tests said of God displaying his power in theophany is being applied directly to Jesus in his public ministry. When the OT material, especially the OT portrayal of Yahweh, enters so massively into a NT miracle story, we have a fairly good indication that we may be dealing with a theological creation of the early church....It is actually a symbolic representation of one way in which the church experienced the risen Christ in its celebration of the eucharist....that begins in the story of the feeding of the five thousand."
Royal or Heavenly Messiah?- Paolo Sacchi, "Recovering Jesus' Formative Background" in Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls (James H. Charlesworth, Ed. - 1992), pp. 131-132
"...It is only here (14.61f.) in the whole gospel of Mark that we find united, in a single question and answer, Jesus' three 'official' Christian titles: Christ (Messiah), Son of Man, and Son of God. Each one usually appears by itself. This suggests that they came from different traditions, perhaps originally from groups that had different notions of Jesus' nature."
Schonfield says that the passage reflects a single tradition hidden by Jesus' public reference to himself as a "son of man".
"Of necessity, at the outset of his public activities, he [Jesus] could not openly claim to be the Messiah or even admit it privately to his disciples (though John's gospel conveys the contrary). Had he declared himself king of the Jews, or allowed others to hail him as such, he would have invited arrest and execution for high treason against Caesar. His mission would have ended when it had hardly begun."
|