Elijah heals Shunammite boy
Preparing the WayThe Path and Purification
A "passage of the Community Rule (ix), mentions...that 'this is the time of the preparation of the Way in the wilderness'. This is specifically tied in exegesis to the Maskil's [the 'Teacher' or the Righteous Teacher] preparation of the Way by 'teaching the Miraculous Mysteries'."
"The Maskil is 'to make known to and teach the sons of Light' (the sons of Dawn?) 'the Ways of Light' and how to 'be reckoned among the Perfect', including, it would appear, 'justifications', 'works' and the like. In particular, he is to instruct them in baptismal procedures, which include being 'purified by the Holy Spirit', 'looking upon the Living Light', and 'walking in Perfection in all the Ways of God, which He commanded concerning His appointed times, and not staying either right or left, nor treading on even one of His words'."
"Deuteronomy held before its readers what it called 'the two ways' - one was the way of blessing and the other was the way of a curse (Deut. 11:26 ff., 30:15-19). Luke was clearly affected by that understanding of Christianity as 'a way of blessing,' for in the Book of Acts he described the Christians as those 'belonging to the Way' (Acts 9:2). He also referred to himself as one who persecuted this Way' (Acts 22:4)."
"...The 'Way' terminology...in terms of the 'study of the Torah' and known to the Book of Acts [is] a name for early Christianity in Palestine from the 40s to the 60s."
(2) Ritual Cleansing
"Water rituals are known throughout the gamut of world religions, and they were especially common in the ancient Near East, notably Iran and Babylonia, as symbols of ritual or spiritual purification and the gift of new life. The OT reflects this milieu with its many prescriptions for ritual washing which the prophets and psalmists in turn used as symbols of interior cleansing."
"The Essenes taught that men must repent spiritually and then be baptised to become purified in that spirit. This concept is alien to Messianic Judaism, but baptism was practiced by the Essenes who, in turn, learned it from the Greek Pythagorean mystery-cult."
"The settlement at Qumran certainly stood in the desert. Its rule ordered baptisms or bathings to make the members pure for their assembly and meals. At the same time, the rule-book made it clear that such washings were no use unless there was a real determination to follow God's ways. This sounds rather like John's call to repent and be baptized. Also the men of Qumran were looking forward to the arrival of God's Messiah."
"The cleansing of Israel with water and the spirit (Ezek 36:25ff.) is what the Qumran people expected in the future of God's activity ([Community Rule] 1QS 4.20-22). In the present the spirit was already experienced as the most effective power in making atonement for sins (lQS 3.6-9). The Qumran people offered themselves as a kind of living sacrifice to God; those who are 'willing for his truth' shall bring all their knowledge, strength, and property into the yahad ['union'] of God (IQS 1.11-12)'."
While Qumran can be geographically connected with the Essenes, there is no direct evidence that the fortified settlement at Qumran harbored the religious sect or played any role in the creation of any of the Dead Sea Scrolls. The sectarian documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, dated a century earlier than contemporary descriptions of the Essenes, refer to the Yahad. Both Essenes and Yahad can be subsumed under the more generic term "Enochian Judaism".
"...Qumran [the Yahad] did not have a monopoly on ascetic holy men practicing ritual purification in the Judean wilderness around the Jordan."
The word "dipped" in Hebrew comes from
"For decades we have known that John the Baptist was only one well-known representative of baptizing groups who congregated especially along the Jordan. Sibylline Oracle Four, which received its final form around 80 CE (because lines 130-34 refer to the eruption of Vesuvius in 79 CE), contains the unique Jewish emphasis that baptism is a prerequisite for salvation. This Jew exhorted 'wretched mortals' to abandon licentious conduct 'and wash your whole bodies in perennial rivers'. After this baptism, God's forgiveness and acceptance are assured, the righteous ones will then be resurrected to a judgment over which God himself will preside."
"The Tosephta (Yadaim 2.20) mentions the 'Dawn Bathers' who criticized the Pharisees for 'invoking the Name (of the Lord) in the morning without having bathed', bringing to mind the 'instructor who spoke to all the sons of the dawn' of one of the recently published scrolls. Other Jewish baptizing groups included the one implied in the Sibylline Oracles, the Hemerobaptists, Galileans, Masbutheans, and Nazareans."
"The more the present seemed plunged into sin and death, the more Israel's prophets hoped for cleansing and renewal in the future, when God would pour out his spirit like water on his people. Around the turn of the era, ritual washings of a voluntary sort were on the increase in various sections of Judaism, for various reasons,. The Pharisees, disgusted at what they considered the corruption of the aristocratic priests in Jerusalem, sought to live out aspects of priestly purity in their daily lives...Syria and Palestine, especially the trans-Jordan area were a hotbed for baptizing groups in the 1st centuries BC and AD."
"...Nudity in baptism was...required by the Pharisees in their baptism of proselytes and immersion for purification (Mikwa'ot 8 and 9; B. Yebamot 47b)."
"Coming from Babylonian Judaism, he [Hillel the Great] taught a personal and ethical renewal which was expressed through baptism in water. Those who had been so purified had become truly Jews. The idea of a New Covenant, or 'religious contract', began to be formed: not the Old Covenant to which all sons of Abraha belonged by birth, but a convenant of personal choice and initiation. There would be a New Israel, a new Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
"Proselyte baptism was part of a process of initiation that transferred a person from one visible socio-religious group (Gentile) to another (Jew); John's baptism did not, and so strictly speaking it was not a rite of initiation. John was not interested in founding a 'new Israel' in any visible, sociological sense."
Something Greater than Solomon
"In Jesus's lifetime people clearly expected that a great figure from their past would return: Elijah, perhaps, or Moses, or even the Queen of Sheba...."
"The most prestigious magical figure from the Jewish legends of Jesus' time was Solomon, son of David, King of Israel and great master of the demons. Solomon's control of demons was a matter of pride for Josephus (Antiquities VIII.45-49), is often reported in Rabbinic literature, and is the subject of a romance preserved in several Greek versions, The Testament of Solomon. In this romance he has one demon who serves as his agent to introduce and direct the others; a similar figure, though with a different name, appears in some of the rabbinic stories (e.g., B. Gittin 68a-b). Solomon's control of the demons was due to his possession of an amulet, the famous seal engraved with the secret name of Yahweh. In the romance this seal was given him by 'the Lord, the highest god, Sabaoth'."
"The generation in question was probably the one contemporary with the Q community during the period 40-60 C.E. What was originally a missionary endeavor is turned, in this revision, into a condemnation of those who refuse to respond to the message of the Q community and who are therefore in danger of the Judgment. By the time of Matthew and Luke, late in the first century, those hostile to the new movement were probably Judeans, from whom the new sect was in the process of separating. The vindictive tone of these sayings is uncharacteristic of Jesus."
The author of Mark incorrectly attributes all of the quote to Isaiah. The first part is actually from Malachi and the sentence which follows is from Isaiah.
"Malachi went on to identify his messenger with the prophet Elijah, whose task it was to prepare the world for the coming of that 'great and terrible day of the Lord' (Mal. 4:5). The word 'Malachi'...[is] a Hebrew word which meant 'my messenger' (see Mal. 1:1). So Malachi, 'my messenger,' was identified as the nameless one, who came in the spirit and power of Elijah to prepare for the advent of the Kingdom of God."
"From Malachi through Ben Sira to the NT and beyond into the rabbinic literature, Elijah was the eschatological prophet par excellence, the prophet whose return from heaven (whither he had been taken up in a fiery chariot) would signal the last days, the regathering and cleansing of Israel, the resolving of all legal questions, and the coming of God to rule in full power. Hence the eschatological prophet and miracle-worker from Nazareth would naturally be connected with Elijah..." (The throne-chariot imagery is central to Merkavah mysticism.) The saga of Elijah-Elisha (880 and 840 B.C.E.) provided the northern equivalent of the Mosaic liberation traditions - in counterpoint to those of the southern Temple at Jerusalem. For example, after Solomon completed the Temple at Jerusalem, he prayed at its inauguration:
"Just as the Temple provided the link to heaven and earth, it was the place where rain was obtained in answer to fidelity or at least to repentance."
"And, secondly, there are the miracles - not just public and communal miracles like control of the rainfall but private and individual miracles...Thus, after Elijah announces his control of the rain in 17:1, he is miraculously fed in the desert by ravens in 17:2-7, multiplies the meal and oil of the pagan widow at Sidonian Zarephath in 17:8-16, and raises her son from the dead in 17:17-24. Only then, in 18:1-46, does the rain story conclude. Elijah has been given power by God over rain, food, and death, over, in other words, all of life."
The northern prophets also had a profound influence on King Josiah, who ordered the Temple in Jerusalem cleansed of the rituals and relics of fertility worship in 628 B.C.E.
"...There was one prerequisite for any 'Messiah' - that his coming would be preceded by a return of the nabi Elijah. According to one view, the re-born Elijah would actually recognize and anoint the Messiah-to-be before that individual was himself aware of his identity."
Some texts in the Dead Sea Scrolls "also speak about an eschatological prophet who will announce the coming of the Messiah, a figure similar to Elijah in the rabinnic tradition."
"In Jewish lore Eliyahoo [Elijah] appears from time to time as an ordinary person and helps Jews in distress. He is supposed to appear before the Messiah comes..."
Passover tables are supposed to have an extra glass of wine for Eliyahoo as he mystically makes his rounds to each and every table.
(2) The Immanent Messiah
"By Messiah, Jesus meant the same thing most other Jews of his time meant: an anointed King who would, with the help of a miracle from God, remove the Romans from Palestine and usher in an age of reform where the Jews would become the priests of mankind. There was no trace of divinity about the concept, no idea that the Messiah would have to be sacrificed to appease an angry God. (Claiming to be the Messiah, Maccoby points out, was in no way considered blasphemous under Jewish law.)" The idea that there was no trace of divinity about the concept of the Messiah is contradicted by Micah 5:2 - "his origin is from of old, from ancient days" and 1 Enoch 48:4 - "From the beginning the Son of Man was hidden." Although the author of The Book of Daniel was writing about his own time in the 2nd century B.C.E., his character, Daniel, lived in Babylon during the reign of king Belshazzar, who was killed when Babylon fell to the Persians in 539 B.C.E. By back dating the prophecy of the coming of the Messiah (Daniel 9:25-26) to the end of the Babylonian captivity and changing "weeks" into "years", the prophecy could be interpreted as referring to the first century C.E. This may have helped foster Messianic expectations and provided Gospel writers with the time frame for the emergence of Jesus. "The command to restore and to build Jerusalem 'went forth' in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king of Persia, that is, in 455 B.C.E. (Nehemiah 2:1-9). By the end of 49 years (7 weeks of years), much of Jerusalem's glory had been restored. And then, counting the full 483 years (7 plus 62 weeks of years) from 455 B.C.E., we arrive at 29 C.E. This was, in fact, the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, the year when Jesus was baptized by John the Baptizer (Luke 3:1)." The expectations of a Messiah who is immanent or who has already arrived are expressed in a commentary on Genesis in the Dead Sea Scrolls.
"...The allusion in 5.5 to 'the men of the Community' with 'the Messiah of Righteousness' as 'Keepers of the Covenant' implies that the Messiah has either already come, is eschatologically to return, or is, in fact, at that very moment connected to or among ' the Yahad' (community). "
(3) A Priestly and a Royal Messiah
The Messiahs of Aaron and Israel
In Old Testament times,...the people of Israel are, in effect, governed by two parallel lines of 'Messiahs', or 'Anointed Ones'. One of these lines presides over spiritual affairs and descends from the Tribe of Levi through Aaron. The other, in the form of the kingship, presides over secular affairs and traces itself, through David, to the Tribe of Judah. This, of course, explains the references in the Dead Sea Scrolls to ''The Messiah(s) of Aaron and of Israel', or 'of Aaron and of David'."
"The Yahad believed that in the Last Days two messiahs would emerge from their own ranks, one a priest, the other a royal commander for the armies."
"Both messiah figures bear the title Son of God,' (4QFlorilegium 10-11). The place of dominion of the high priestly messiah is heaven, the royal messiah's is earth. The high priestly messiah takes precedence over the royal messiah. This is especially clear at the messianic banquet, where he blesses bread and wine....(Rule of the Congregation 1QSa 11.11-21)."
The Priestly Messiah
In scroll 4Q541, the latter part of the Words of Levi, "a prophecy is given of a mighty priest who will arise and 'reveal hidden mysteries' and whose 'teaching is like the will of God' - much like the 'chosen one...who will reveal secrets like the Most High' (4Q536 1.8) and whose 'wisdom shall come to all peoples' (4Q534 col 1, 1.8)."
"The coming priest of The Words of Levi ...may well be 'the chosen one' of this text [4Q534-4Q536], that is, the priestly messiah, who, with the 'Leader of the Nation,' the royal messiah, shall rule Israel in the Last Days."
"The priestly messiah and the priests will not take part in the final battles, but they will spur on the others through shouts and trumpet blasts: "
Two or a Single Messiah?
The "pesharim to Isaiah and Habakkuk...speak of a single messiah from the stem of David rather than of two Messiahs, of Aaron and of David, belief in whom is endorsed by the authors of the Manual of Discipline."
"As we have suggested, contrary to the well-known 'two-Messiah' theory of early Qumran scholarship, these references to the 'Messiah of Aaron and Israel' in the Damascus Document are singular not plural... and one possible explanation for it is that it is evoking a Messiah with both priestly and kingly implications, like the somewhat similar recitations of Hebrews." A separate Messianic tradition which fits into the pattern of "two messiahs", is described in the Apocalypse of Zechariah. Here a priestly leader named Joshua/Jesus is to rule side by side with Zerubbabel, the political leader who rebuilt the temple after the Babylonian captivity.
"As the critics point out, the present form of this last passage is somewhat corrupted. Apparently it originally spoke of crowns for Genealogies of John and Jesus
"Names were often derived from ancient stories based on typological association: John's father was a priest, so his name must have been Zechariah, a priestly name mentioned frequently in Chronicles. However, there is no evidence outside the infancy; stories that John's father was a priest. Both vocation and name may be fictions."
"Biblical scholars have seen no reason to doubt Luke's assertion that John and Jesus were first cousins. It is now generally accepted that Jesus's mother was the sister of Elizabeth, the mother of John. But Luke also makes it plain that John the Baptist, through his mother, was descended from the priestly dynastic succession of Aaron - which would mean, of course, that Jesus was too. At the same time, Luke stresses Jesus's descent, through his father, from David. Thus, as a descendant of Aaron, John can lay claim to the title of Priest Messiah. Jesus, descended from both Aaron and David, can lay claim to the titles of Priest Messiah and Royal Messiah."
"The Epistle to the Hebrews does mention - as an apparent obstacle to its thesis that Jesus is the high priest of the new covenant - that he was of the tribe of Judah, not Levi (Hebrews 7:14)." In addition, there is good reason to doubt that John and Jesus really were first cousins. In the Gospel of John, John the Baptist says of Jesus "And I knew him not." According to Michael Goulder and others, Luke's account is based more on his midrashic rewriting of Mark than an actual account of history.
Luke "started with the name Mary, the name by which Mark had identified Jesus' mother in the second Marcan scriptural reference to her (Mark 6:1-6). Relating that name to her Marys/Mirians in the Hebrew sacred story, he happened upon the account of Miriam, Moses' sister, who had a kinswoman named Elizabeth/Elisheba. Then he fleshed out his narrative by making the new Elizabeth a member of a priestly family, a tradition that descended from Aaron, who was married to the first Elizabeth/Elisheba [Exod 6:23]....If they were sisters-in-law, then their offspring would be first cousins."
"Luke began his gospel by introducing first Zechariah and then Elizabeth, the parents of John the Baptist. He portrayed them, however, quite overtly after the pattern of Abraham and Sarah from the Book of Genesis that was being read in the synagogues. The connections between the two stories are overwhelming."
"Both sets of parents were called righteous (Gen. 26:5, Luke 1:6). Both Sarah and Elizabeth were barren (Gen. 11:30, Luke 1:7). Both were advanced in age (Gen 18:11, Luke 1:7). In both stories the angelic annunciation came to a disbelieving father (Gen. 18:11, Luke 1:11). Both fathers were assured that nothing was impossible with God (Gen. 18:14, Luke 1:37)."
"Some scholars think the birth story of John the Baptist preserved in Luke (1:5-25, 57-80) derives from John's followers and reflects their messianic understanding of him."
"...The infancy Narratives of the Baptist and Jesus basically parallel each other, with some trait of superiority being assigned to Jesus at each stage of the symmetrical narrative....It is highly likely that, whatever the starting point of Luke's Infancy Narrative, each cycle of birth traditions influenced the other as the two were woven together. An artificial connection of the two cycles is visible in Luke's account of the visitation of Mary to Elizabeth..."
The Ministry of John The Baptist
A Call to Repentance
"The trumpet is to remind the Lord of His covenant with Israel [and] to confuse Satan, who would normally accuse Israel of sinning on the feast. Ancient rabbis believed that the world was created on the Feast of Trumpets, that is why it is called Rosh Hashanah (the head of the year).
"The New Year was also perceived as a time of judgment and even as a time of divine vengeance. As that judgment dawned, the tradition of the Jews was that eyes were opened, ears were unstopped, and a highway was prepared on which God might travel. This highway began in the desert, which was thought of as the abode of unclean animals, like the camel (Lev.11:4) or the satyr or the 'scapegoat' that was driven into the wilderness with the people's sins on its back (Lev.17.7)."
Eli'jah Who is to Come
The gospels of Mark and Matthew alluded to John as a contemporary Elijah who will announce the coming of the Messiah.
"...Matthew follows his usual practice of regarding every significant event as having been anticipated by scripture."
"By contrast with Luke a good part of his story focused on Jesus as the new and greater Elijah..." To Luke, John the Baptist is not Elijah or Elias, but only comes in the spirit of Elias.
"It was the Gospel of Luke...that seemed to have the greatest investment in Elijah as a prototype figure for his Christ story. Luke wanted to save Elijah to enable him to tell about the climactic moments in the life of Jesus." (See the sections on the Pentecost and the ascension for more about Luke's identification of Jesus as Elijah.)
"John 1:20 has John not only deny he is the Christ but even Elijah."
(The dimished role attributed to John the Baptist probably reflects rivalry between the followers of Jesus and John which became more pronounced as time passed following their deaths.)
A Lonely Ascetic?
"...Unlike the Essenes, John, in the Gospels and Josephus, appears as a lonely ascetic, like the desert saint at whose feet Josephus had sat. What, then, was John the Baptist's relation to the sect? Dr. Brownlee suggests that John may have been one of those 'other men's children' that Josephus says the Essenes adopted and 'moulded in accordance with their own principles."
"This would give us an explanation of the otherwise rather unaccountable circumstance that John's childhood was spent in the desert. I have nowhere seen it suggested that John was at odds with the sect; but, in connection with his desert diet of locusts and wild honey, one remembers the expelled Essenes, who resorted to living on grass because they had sworn an oath never to eat any food not prepared by the brotherhood. Josephus, despite having visited the Essenes and mentioning several other figures as Essenes never defines John the Baptist as one suggesting he was not during the time of his ministry." Josephus, however, does mention one Essene in the middle of the first century who may also have lived as a lonely ascetic.
"...Even apart from Luke's picture of the boy John being raised in the wilderness until the time he began his ministry, the mere fact that this ascetic prophet feeding on locusts and wild honey roamed up and down the Jordan Valley and the Judean wilderness, apparently with no fixed abode as he proclaimed a radical message of imminent judgment on Israel, makes it probable that John was a celibate (Mark 1:4-8)."
"In the Hebrew scriptures that shaped this story of John the Baptist, it was said of the prophet Elijah that 'he was a hairy man with a leather belt around his waist' (2 Kings 1:8), who lived in the wilderness (1 Kings 17:1-4). The locusts that accompanied the wild honey as the diet of the desert were also kosher, declared the Book of Leviticus (11:22)." Consecrated to the Service of God
"Grotius, on Numbers 6:18, takes notice that the Greeks also, as well as the Jews, sometimes consecrated the hair of their heads to the gods." Nazar - to vow or consecrate oneself to the service of God. There is nothing written that John (or Jesus for that matter) abstained from cutting his hair, the most conspicuous feature of a nazar or nazarite. Also, according to the Gospels, Jesus often drank wine. Wine appears to have been an integral part of the communal meals of both the early Christian and Yahad communities.
A Connection with Qumran?
"Our Nazarene sect is known to have existed some 150 years B.C., and to have lived on the banks of the Jordan, and on the eastern shore of the Dead Sea, according to Pliny and Josephus (Antiquities of the Jews xiii, p. 9; xv, p. 10)."
"The settlement at Qumran certainly stood in the desert. Its rule ordered baptisms or bathings to make the members pure for their assembly and meals. At the same time, the rule-book made it clear that such washings were no use unless there was a real determination to follow God's ways. This sounds rather like John's call to repent and be baptized." The structure at Qumran was more likely a fortified Herodian manor, not a religious settlement. However, the Yahad did practice ritualistic lustration like the Christians.
(2) A Politically Explosive Rite Characteristics of John
"...John practices not the frequent lustrations of Qumran [the Yahad] but a once-and-for-all baptism administered to others by himself. So closely is his own person identified with this unique kind of ritual washing that he alone, among the many Jews of his day who practiced rites of cleansing, is called 'the Baptist'."
John offered more than ritual purification. He offered absolution from sin and did away with the need for expensive sacrifices at the Temple, whose officials he considered morally bankrupt.
"John...displays some characteristics of the thoughts and literature of apocalyptic, yet other common elements (mystical visions interpreted by angels, journeys through the various levels of the cosmos up to heaven and God's throne, astrological and calendric speculations, timetables of salvation history, phantasmagoric symbols and esoteric allegories, the question of the fate of the Gentile nations, and a doctrine of the survival of the individual after death) are lacking in the material that has come down to us...In clear simple speech he preaches on the basis of his own personal authority, which apparently he feels comes directly from God."
Stirring Up the Multitudes
"In the public mind, John was very likely a much 'bigger' presence than Jesus. Josephus, the Jewish historian, states flatly that Herod Antipas feared John on the grounds that the Baptist could instigate a revolution; as a consequence, he had John executed. The Jews later viewed the destruction of Herod's army as retribution for John's execution (Antiquities 18.118-119). The Gospel of Mark reports, probably with some exaggeration, that all the residents of Judea and Jerusalem were baptized by John (Mark 1:5) and that everybody considered John a prophet (Mark 11:32). Some of the supporters of John probably adopted the cause of Jesus' followers and introduced Johannine elements, such as fasting and baptism, into the nascent Christian movement."
"By John's time the only place in the country where Jews could legally offer sacrifices was Jerusalem, and its services were expensive. To introduce into this situation a new, inexpensive, generally available, divinely authorized rite, effective for the remission of all sins, was John's great invention." If left unchecked, John's growing popularity directly threatened the Temple revenues and the political stability of the region.
"...John appears as a prophet proclaiming an imminent judgment on an unrepentant Israel, an Israel that as a people has strayed from the right path. There is a dark, threatening tone to most of his message, which speaks sharply even to those who approach him for baptism.. Though not fitting a fully rounded definition of an apocalyptic seer, John does stress the imminence of fiery punishment that looms for every Israelite."
"A Network of Ticking Time Bombs"
"...Josephus has no mention of what is most politically explosive about John's rite: people cross over into the desert and are baptized in the Jordan as they return to the Promised Land. And that is dangerously close to certain millennial prophets, well known to Josephus...who, in the period between 44 and 62 C.E., invoked the desert and the Jordan to imagine a new and transcendental conquest of the Promised Land." According to scripture, the Jordan had been parted by Joshua to allow the Israelites to cross from the Wilderness into the Promised Land of freedom. [Joshua 3:6, 14-17; Joshua 4:10, 21, 23]
"John the Baptist was one of several populist and activist prophets who, in that first century occupied Jewish homeland, attempted to reenact the Exodus as archetypal deliverance from foreign oppression. Most of them led large crowds from the desert across the Jordan hoping that God would intervene decisively against the Romans, so that they could once again possess their Promised Land as inaugurally of old under Moses and Joshua. They were normally unarmed, since they expected a cataclysmic intervention by God to effect what human weapons could not achieve."
"When people came to him [John], he kept sending them back from the wilderness, through the Jordan, which washed away their sins, and, purified and ready, into the Promised Land, there to await the imminent coming of the redeeming and avenging God. What he was forming, in other words, was a giant system of sanctified individuals [rather than crowds], a huge web of apocalyptic expectations, a network of ticking time bombs all over the Jewish homeland. Its magnitude insured a lasting memory, but its diffusion made it both possible and necessary for Antipas to strike precisely at John himself and at John alone."
"The oldest Nazarenes, who were the descendants of the Scripture nazars, and whose last prominent leader was John the Baptist, although never very orthodox in the sight of the scribes and Pharisees of Jerusalem, were, nevertheless, respected and left unmolested. Even Herod [Antipas] 'feared the multitude' because they regarded John as a prophet."
Death of a Prophet
Artetas avenged Herod's breach of contract by raising an army and decisively defeating Herod's army.
Note that Macherus in Section 1 (the flight of Aretas' daughter) is in the hands of Aretas. In the paragraph above it is under Herod's control.
"Although Josephus does not refer to John as a prophet, his twofold comment that the military defeat of Herod was seen by many as a vindication of John is in stark contrast to the scorn he pours of several 'false prophets' who led abortive uprisings."
Questions about Josephus' Reference to John "Paragraph three, omitting the John the Baptist passage in paragraph two, begins with:" "The two paragraphs were obviously meant to be read in order, paragraph one is directly followed by paragraph three and makes correct sense without the John paragraph, which interrupts the narrative." "These two events [Vitellius' preparation for war and John's arrest] were supposed to have happened around the same time, the date is given specifically in the third paragraph. As Vitellius was on the march he was informed of the death of the emperor:" - Cliff Carrington, "The Flavian Testament"
"Tiberius died and Caius Caligula succeeded to the empire in the year 37 CE. This puts the Baptist passage in the middle of two paragraphs dating from 37; or several years after the traditional dates, 29 to 30 CE, of John the Baptist's execution and, incidentally, Jesus' baptism.
Reports of Resurrection
"The notion that John the Baptist may have risen from the dead (Mark 6:14, 16, 8:28) probably originated with the disciples of John. This conviction of John's disciples may have established the pattern of expectation for the disciples of Jesus after his crucifixion.
|