The Tel Amarna TabletsBiblical Parallels in the Time of David"In 1887, 380 clay tablets were discovered in Egypt at a place called Tell el-Amarna and have come to be known as the Amarna tablets. These tablets were letters from foreign rulers, mainly of city-states but also of the more powerful northern kingdoms of present-day Syria, Turkey and Cyprus, as well as what was once Babylonia and Assyria. They were written to the Egyptian pharaoh of the day; this was Amenhotep IV who soon changed his name to the famous Akhenaten. According to conventional chrononology, Amenhotep III ruled from 1402 to 1364 B.C.E. and his son Akhenaton from 1364-1347 B.C.E.
Amenhotep IV "revived the ancient cult of the sun god in the form of Aten (the disc of the sun). Amenhotep believed that the Aten revealed himself only to his 'son', the king. He changed his name to Akhenaten ('living spirit of the Aten') in honor of his god."
"The Akkadian language was the lingua franca of the time [of the Pharaoh Akhenaten] and was used as the official language of correspondence between the city-state rulers of the Levant and Pharaoh. The majority of the tablets found at Amarna were letters sent to Egypt from these city-state rulers or file copies of replies from Pharaoh (EA 45 to EA 382), but there was also correspondence from the 'Great Kings' of the powerful northern kingdoms of Mitanni, Hatti (Turkey), Alashiya (Cyprus), Karduniash (Babylonia) and Assyria (EA 1 to EA 45)."
"Some of them were anxious letters written from Jerusalem (Urusalim), warning the pharaoh an invasion by the 'Habiru [Khabiru]', approaching from Trans-Jordan." Akhenaton's mother, Queen Tiye, was evidiently the recipient of the letters addressed to her son and ignored the pleas for help.
"The Amarna tablets paint a picture of a tribal Palestine ruled by various city-state rulers of Canaanite, Philistine and Israelite/Hebrew origin as well as the larger state of Amurru/Aram to the north, very much corroborating the biblical picture of Samuel. They tell us that the coastal plains were in the hands of Philistines of Indo-European origin, dominated by city-state rulers with Indo-European names who communicate with Pharaoh Akhenaten in the Amarna letters. The Bible tells of the coastal plains being out of the control of Saul and under Philistine rule. The city of Gezer in the Amarna letters is under Canaanite rulers; Gezer in the Bible is under Canaanite rule until given to Solomon as a dowry by Pharaoh in I Kings 9:16."
(1) David in the Time of Tuthmosis III? Kings Saul and David reigned in the 10th century B.C.E. according to the biblical chronology but Josephus dates David to a far earlier period.
The seige of the second Temple in Jerusalem by Antiochus can accurately be dated to 167 B.C.E. Adding another thousand and three hundred years puts David's funeral at 1467 B.C.E., or almost 450 years before the generally accepted date (circa 1020 B.C.E.) This, according to conventional chronology, would be during the reign of the greatest Egyptian warrior-pharoah Tuthmosis III [1490-1436 B.C.E.], who extended the Egyptian empire to its furthest limits.
"The David who established an empire that stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates can only have lived in the fifteenth century B.C...The Israelite infiltration of Canaan, the Promised land, was a fragmentary process that did not gather pace until after Egypt lost control over Palestine in the second half of the twelfth century B.C...The David whose main campaigns were against the Philistines cannot have lived before the twelfth century B.C. because that was when the mass invasion of the coastal plain of Canaan by the Philistines took place."
"It is remarkable that none of the letters from Tel Amarna refer to central Palestine. There is no mention of any town in lower Galilee or in Samaria, except Zabuba, and Megiddo. Taanach, Shechem, Jezreel, Dothan, Bethel, and other such places are unnoticed, as well as Heshbon, Medeba, Rabbath-Amon, Ramoth-Gilead, and the places in Moab and Gilead. The Egyptians probably had no stations in these wild mountains, where their chariots could not pass. No towns in the regions of Samaria or Gilead or Moab occur in the list of places taken by Thothmoses III; nor were there any stations in the Hebron mountains. The nearest places to Hebron seem to have been Nezeb, in the valley of Elah, easily reached by a broad, flat road, and on the south Kanaan (Kanana), a fortress, which is only two miles southwest of Hebron. The inhabitants of Hebron were never apparently disturbed by the chariots, and appear in the Tel Amarna tablets as marauders of the Egyptian stations. On the other hand, many places in Sharon and Philistina, and in the lower hills to the east, and in the Nezeb hills south of Hebron, were conquered by Thothmoses III."
(2) David in the Time of Thutmose IV?
"The city of Beth-shan was long an Egyptian outpost and during his first battle against the Canaanites, one of the local kings killed in the valley of Beth-shan, was placed on the city walls along with that king's slain sons, as was customary for Amenhotep II."
"Thutmose III's forces controlled much of Palestine after his victory over the locals at Megiddo in 1438 BCE. During the time of Saul at one of the Battles in the valley of Ephesdam'mim, the enemy's champion had challenged the Israelite forces for forty days before David came forward to take it up. Goliath was defeated, and the Egyptians were driven back to their border. Years later Saul was killed in Battle by Amenhotep II in the valley of Beth-shan, near Mt. Gilbo'a."
"The leader of the 'men of blood' is in another letter shown to be D_D. This is demonstrated to be David."
"At this time David was pretending to be in league with the Egyptians, a confederate of A'chish. But he trusted David completely, never realizing that David had been raiding the cities of the alliance. David was made king over the tribe of Judah and ruled from Hebron. He continued to make raids on the various Egyptain outposts throughout the Palestine area. And many letters were written to Egypt complaining about the "marauders" and "men of blood" based around the hills of Hebron.
"Soon Thutmose IV sent out a large force to fight against king David in the valley of the Giants. This was made up from the armies of the alliance and troops from Egypt as well. However, David's army caught them by surprise and defeated Thutmose IV's force and drove them all the way back to Egypt's boundary south of Gaza.
"King Abimel (Hiram) of Tyre sought to make a treaty with David after Jo'ab defeated him and others of the alliance."
"David went up into Syria and in league with the king of Egypt as one of his vassals, fought and defeated Du Srutta king of Mittia. This figure is better known in the Old Testament as Hadad'ezer of Zoab."
"In the Amarna letters, Jerusalem is ruled by Jebusites, a Hurrian elite race. In II Samuel 5:6,7, this is also the case until the city is conquered by David. The name of the ruler of Jerusalem is given in the Amarna letters as Abdiheba, a mixed Semitic/Hurrian name. The Amarna tablets tell of the whole region of Syria dominated by kings of Amorite stock including a king Aziru. The Bible in II Samuel speaks of this kingdom being Aram and the king being Hadadezer, one of David's enemies. Aziru is considered to be the accepted shortening or hypocoristicon of a longer, more formal name. Given that Hadad was a prominent god of the Arameans and that -Aziru (or -ezer) means helper of', it can be seen that the Amarna letters use the shortened name of the Aramean king Helper of Hadad' or Hadadezer, a startling biblical confirmation."
"The name 'fierceness as the lion is his strength,' in Hebrew is rendered Hadad'ezer and in the Syrian (Persian) is rendered as Du(r) Srutta."
"He [David] then went further and defeated the other Syrian forces that came to Du Srutta's aid. After this David put a garrison at Damascus to put down any insurrections that may have followed.
"The first of many Judean kings who served under the sovereignty of Egypt. Solomon [son of David] is the most noted."
David's low profile in the alliance "may be the fault of the historians who gave the victories of the foreign kings in their lands little to no credit, while on the other hand heaping all the glory upon the Pharaoh, the king of Egypt, the god of Canaanites (Ba'al). (The Egyptian kings were worshipped by their Canaanite subjects and called in both masculine and feminine forms. Statuettes have been confirmed as in the likeness of king Narmer's famous pose. [Shem B. Toshawb, The True Hebrew Antiquities and Sayce, Archaeology of the Cuneiform Inscriptions, chapters V and VII])."
(3) David as 'Malchiel'? At the time of the Tel Amarna tablets Jerusalem was controlled by the Jeb'usites. Their ruler, Ebed-Kheba [a Hittite name] , was unsuccessful in preventing the Egyptian garrisons from abandoning their positions before the Khabiru governor lay siege to the city. The Khabiru governor's name was 'Malchiel' (God's appointed) who had remarkable parallels to the biblical King David.
Malchiel "lived in Hebron, governed the area there, married a daughter of Tagi, took Jerusalem and proclaimed himself king of the Hebrews."
Bringing the Time Frame Forward
"...King Nikmaddu II and the priests of Ugarit watched with foreboding from the roof of the temple of Baal as the day was 'put to shame at sunset' at precisely 6.09pm on the 9th of May 1012 BC - just thirty minutes before the sun set! Close to the eclipsed solar disc was a giant star which would explode so violently some two thousand years later. Astronomers have christened this spectacular supernova the Crab Nebula. The god Rashap who attended the sun's entry into the nether-world was a giant star approaching its nemesis." "This entirely independent chronological determination confirms that the el-Amarna period fell in the late eleventh century BC and not in the mid fourteenth century BC as previously believed." This moves the time frame of the Amarna letters forward to the era of Saul and David - 1010 to 971 B.C.E.
(2) A Lawless Period
"From the Amarna Letters we can see that the Habiru groups are comprised of stateless persons who are outside the normal protection of city-state law. The adult males tend to be fighting men who hire themselves out to the local rulers as mercenaries. In the earliest letters a number of the city rulers have platoons of Habiru troops which they use to guard their petty kingdoms and sometimes to settle feuds over disputed territory."
"The hill country to the north of Jerusalem is dominated by a king who shows scant respect towards Egyptian sovereignty in Palestine. His hypocoristic name is Labau - his fuller name being unknown. Moran [Les Lettres d'el-Amarna: Correspondance diplomatique du pharaon] suggests that name should be understood as 'Great Lion [of N]' where 'N' represents the name of a deity." Hiding from Saul's men in the cave of En-Gedi, David wrote:
Labayu contended for power with the kings of Jerusalem and Gezer, and had possession of the hill country and attempted to penetrate the Jezreel valley, laying siege to Megiddo. He sent an uncompromising letter to the pharoah (probably Amenhotep III).
"As already recognized by; the interpreters, this idiom is pure Hebrew." There are close parallels between Labayu's seizure of his home town and sacred site, and Saul's campaigns against Geba/Gibeah where a Philistine pillar had been erected at a high place sacred to the Israelites.
"This event is mentioned by Labayu as he writes to the Pharaoh in EA 252, to say that he was recapturing his home town which was taken by the Philistines, even after it had been agreed in the presence of the governor from Egypt that this would not happen!
"In EA 254, Labayu's third letter to Pharaoh, he reprimands his own son for consorting with the Habiru/Hebrews without his knowledge. This is also told in I Samuel 20:30,31." Saul (the "Lion [of Yahweh]'") was eventually killed on Mount Gilboa, to be succeeded by his youngest son and son-in-law (David) . In the Amarna letters, Labayu was also smitten and replaced by "the two sons of Labayu"
"The deaths of Saul and his sons, Jonathan, Abinadab and Malkishua are recorded in I Samuel 31. They occur at the battle of Mount Gilboa in a clash with the Philistines. After gathering at the fountain of Jezreel, the Israelites retreated into the mountains so that the Philistines could not make use of their chariots and cavalry. How the Philistines were successful in pursuing Saul up the mountains is not clear in the Bible but the Amarna tablets answer some intriguing questions. In EA 250, a ruler of a city-state reports to Pharaoh that Saul's surviving sons have asked for help to inflict revenge on a city called Gina (biblical En-Ganim) for killing their father. Also, in EA 245, Biridiya, Philistine ruler of Megiddo, writes to say that when he arrived on the battle field, Labayu was already dead and so could not be taken alive and sent to Egypt for public execution as Pharaoh had wanted."
(2) David in the Time of Akhenaten?
"The most striking parallels by far are found in the story of David's outlawry....[David's gang] roam the countryside seeking the favor and protection of cities (Keilah), wealthy individuals (Nabal), and kings (?Nahash of Ammon, cf. II Samuel 10:2). Finally David offers the services of his band (600 men - a veritable army!) to Achish, king of Gath. Achish assigns them quarters ('gives them' in biblical and el-Amarna usage) in Ziklag. The town becomes the military base of their marauding operations."
"David's power begins to rise after the death of Saul; after seven and a half years, he is king of all Israel. As his power increases, we read in the Amarna letters desperate pleas for help from Pharaoh against the rampaging Hebrews. Most poignant of all comes from the Jebusite king of Jerusalem, Abdiheba. In EA 288 he writes that he is an island amidst a sea of violence as cities fall to the Hebrews round about him. The fall of Lachish is recorded and Pharaoh is reminded that he has done nothing to help. The king asks to be brought to Egypt with his brothers for safety. However, there never was a rescue as in 1003 BC, David conquered Jerusalem; nothing is ever heard from Abdiheba again in the Amarna letters!"
"The Hebrew ts (tsade) is often interchanged with a hard t (tet) in other west-semitic languages such as Ugaritic, Pheonician and Aramaic, and also in Indo-European Greek."
"After the death of Saul/Labayu, we know from the biblical account that Saul's son Ishbaal/Ish-Bosheth and David vied for power (II Samuel 3:1). Ishbaal fled across the Jordan after the death of his father and from there he wrote to Pharaoh the tablet EA 256 (in the British Museum)..."
·"Yanhamu is the official representative of Pharaoh in Palestine."
"El-Amarna letter EA 256 contains the names of five of the leading players from the books of Samuel. The letter itself is written by Ishbaal [= Mutbaal =' man of Baal], son of Saul, who in turn refers to Joab [= Ayab = 'Ya(weh) is the father'] (David's military commander), Baanah [= Benenima = 'son of Ana'] (one of Israel's chieftains), David [= Dadua = 'the beloved (of Yahweh)] (ruler of Hebron and son-in-law of Saul), and finally Jesse [= Yishuya = '(Yahweb) exists'] (father of David)."
"As well as confirming the names of these characters, the Amarna letters even contain the name Goliath in its Akkadian form Gulatu (in EA 292 and 294)!"
"King David, the dynastic founder of Israelite Jerusalem, was a contemporary of Akhenaten, Tutankhamun, Ay and Haremheb (early reign) in Egypt and the Hittite emperor, Suppiluliumas I. He forged his kingdom in the historical period when Egypt was politically and militarily weak and when the latter's northern ally, the kingdom of Mitanni, was disintegrating under the combined pressure of the Hittites to the west and the Assyrians to the north-east."
"The cities and royal residences of LB IIA-B in Palestine were built of fine ashlar masonry befitting the 'Phoenician tradition' as described in Kings and Chronicles. The literary tradition of Psalms would now be set in an era of great hymns and epic poetry, vividly represented in the literature of LBA Ugarit. Akhenaten's 'Hymn to the Aten', so often closely compared to Psalm 104, would have been composed in Egypt when King David, the author of Psalm 104, ruled in Israel. Without question, both culturally and historically, the Late Bronze Age best reflects the era of the rise and then artistic culmination of Israel's United Monarchy."
| |||||||||||||||